Listen to the article
Australia has become the first country to implement a nationwide ban preventing children under 16 from accessing major social media platforms, shifting responsibility for enforcement entirely to technology companies rather than parents or minors themselves.
The groundbreaking policy, formalized through the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024, took effect Wednesday after receiving parliamentary approval. The legislation establishes an unprecedented legal barrier to social media access for young teens and children across all major platforms.
Under the new regulations, parental permission cannot override the age restriction, and minors cannot simply self-certify their age. The law places enforcement obligations solely on tech companies, with potential court-imposed penalties awaiting platforms that fail to implement adequate age verification systems.
According to Raising Children Australia, platforms must now verify user ages through methods such as ID-based checks or AI-powered facial-age estimation technology. Companies must also provide alternative verification options for users unwilling or unable to provide identification documents. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner will oversee enforcement, with authority to seek penalties against companies that don’t take “reasonable steps” to comply.
The ban’s scope encompasses virtually all major social platforms, including TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Reddit, Twitch, Threads, and Kick. For existing accounts held by users under 16, platforms will need to identify and disable them.
A limited number of “safe-listed” applications remain accessible to minors, including YouTube Kids, WhatsApp, Google Classroom, Messenger Kids, and various educational and helpline tools designed specifically for younger users.
The legislation represents a significant departure from previous approaches to online safety, which typically focused on parental controls or platform-specific policies rather than government-mandated age restrictions.
However, not all child advocacy groups support the measure. UNICEF Australia, while acknowledging the good intentions behind creating safer online environments, has criticized the blanket age prohibition. The organization argues that simply preventing access doesn’t address fundamental structural problems within social media ecosystems.
In a public statement, UNICEF noted that harmful content, predatory behavior, aggressive algorithmic design, and inadequate reporting mechanisms remain unresolved issues regardless of age restrictions. The organization also expressed concern that young people themselves—the direct targets of this policy—were largely excluded from the consultation process during the law’s development.
The Australian legislation has amplified similar conversations in the United States, where lawmakers are considering their own approach to social media age restrictions. A bipartisan group of senators led by Brian Schatz has introduced the Kids Off Social Media Act, which proposes a more nuanced framework than Australia’s complete ban.
The U.S. proposal would prohibit social media accounts for children under 13, aligning with existing platform policies that are often poorly enforced. It would also ban algorithmic recommendation feeds—such as TikTok’s “For You Page” and Instagram’s Explore feature—for users under 17, directly targeting the engagement-driven content delivery systems that critics say can lead to harmful content exposure and addictive usage patterns.
The proposed U.S. legislation would empower the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general to enforce violations, while requiring schools to implement measures restricting social media access on their networks.
While the U.S. proposal faces a long legislative road ahead, Australia’s pioneering approach has created a real-world test case for government-mandated social media age restrictions that policymakers worldwide will be watching closely. The effectiveness of Australia’s enforcement mechanisms and the impact on both tech companies and young users will likely influence similar initiatives in other countries grappling with youth social media safety concerns.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
6 Comments
This policy raises some interesting questions around privacy, consent, and the role of government versus tech companies in regulating online spaces. It will be worth following the debate and outcomes as this new approach unfolds in Australia.
An interesting policy move to prioritize child safety online. While the tech companies will face challenges in enforcement, it’s a proactive step to protect young users from the risks of social media. Curious to see how this impacts platform usage and adoption in Australia.
This seems like a bold move by Australia to address concerns around social media’s impact on youth. It will be important to monitor the real-world effects and whether the age verification methods prove effective. Striking the right balance between child protection and personal freedoms is no easy task.
I agree, the implementation will be critical. Tech companies may resist the added burden, so compliance and enforcement will need to be robust. Curious to see if this model is adopted elsewhere or faces legal challenges.
Australia is taking a firm stance on social media access for minors. While the intention is good, the practical realities of enforcing such a ban could be quite complex. Curious to see how the platforms respond and if the policy has the desired impact on child safety.
An ambitious and controversial move by Australia to restrict social media access for youth. While the goals are understandable, the technical and logistical challenges of effective enforcement seem significant. Curious to see how this impacts platform usage and the broader social media landscape.