Listen to the article
U.S. agencies are on high alert for potential cyberattacks following the country’s January 3 attack on Venezuela to capture President Nicolás Maduro. Security experts fear that nations aligned with Venezuela, particularly Russia and China, could launch retaliatory digital strikes against American interests.
“While CISA has not identified a specific threat at this time, we remain steadfast in monitoring for any indicators of malicious activity,” said Madhu Gottumukkala, acting director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, emphasizing the need for “heightened vigilance” in the current climate.
The agency’s monitoring capabilities have been hampered by staffing changes implemented under the Trump administration. Last year, CISA reduced personnel dedicated to tracking online misinformation, part of a broader reorganization following Republican accusations that the agency had overstepped its authority by allegedly censoring protected speech.
Since the U.S. operation in Venezuela, cybersecurity monitors have observed a significant uptick in misleading content circulating online. However, much of this material appears to be coming from individual users rather than coordinated state operations.
“There has been a wave of hoaxes created with AI, there is a lot of synthetic content on social media,” explained Adrián González, co-founder of Venezuela-based misinformation watchdog Cazadores de Fake News. “But it is spontaneous: it is content generated by the same users, which confuses a lot of other users.”
González noted that despite documented historical coordination between Venezuela and Russia to amplify propaganda, the current wave of fake content lacks the hallmarks of an organized campaign. “These videos are generated in a spontaneous way and are not coordinated by a large number of users,” he said. “They don’t form part of coordinated disinformation operations.”
Some of the most widely shared AI-generated images purportedly show Maduro in prison, content which fact-checkers have worked to debunk. “They are creating images of Maduro detained that don’t exist, creating videos of Maduro dancing, uniformed in jail, or of the destruction of military or iconic installations of Chavismo that, in reality, were never destroyed,” González said. Chavismo refers to the left-wing political ideology associated with former president Hugo Chávez and continued under Maduro’s leadership.
Digital threat researchers have also identified more sophisticated preparation for potential disinformation campaigns. Rishika Desai, a threat researcher with cybersecurity firm BforeAI, reported a surge in suspicious domain registrations.
“We identified over 140 domains in various stages of preparation in the past three days, referencing alleged ‘releases’ or sites claiming as his [Maduro’s] official narrative,” Desai said. The firm documented more than 460 new domains focused on themes like Nobel Peace Prize claims and petition campaigns against political figures.
The researchers have also spotted financially motivated scams emerging in the chaos. “We noted the emergence of coin-branded narratives, including so-called ‘Venezuelan libre’ tokens and ‘Crypto Maduro,’ which are commonly used for fraudulent investments and pump-and-dump schemes,” Desai added.
While Venezuela has long employed information warfare tactics through state media and online supporters, these efforts have typically lacked the sophistication and global reach seen in operations by Russia and China. Experts remain concerned that these larger powers could leverage the current situation to intensify their own digital operations against U.S. interests.
The situation highlights the increasingly complex intersection of geopolitical conflicts and digital information spaces. As tensions between the United States and Venezuela continue, cybersecurity agencies and independent monitors face the dual challenge of tracking potential state-sponsored attacks while combating the flood of misleading content generated by opportunistic individuals.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


8 Comments
Cyberattacks targeting critical infrastructure or government systems could have devastating consequences. I hope the US and its allies are taking this threat seriously and have robust defenses and response plans in place.
It’s encouraging to hear that CISA is closely monitoring the situation, even if they haven’t identified a specific threat yet. Staying vigilant and prepared is crucial, given the potential for escalation and retaliation in the cyber realm.
The Trump administration’s decision to reduce CISA’s focus on tracking online misinformation seems short-sighted now. Disinformation can be a powerful tool for adversaries looking to sow chaos and division. I hope CISA is able to quickly rebuild those capabilities.
Absolutely. Tackling disinformation effectively requires dedicated resources and expertise. Hopefully this incident serves as a wake-up call to reinforce CISA’s role in this area.
This is a concerning development. Cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns can have serious consequences, especially given the geopolitical tensions surrounding the situation in Venezuela. I hope the US and other observers are able to effectively monitor and mitigate any malicious online activity.
Agreed. With staffing changes at CISA, it will be critical for the agency to coordinate closely with other government and private sector partners to maintain vigilance.
The uptick in misleading online content following the US operation in Venezuela is troubling. I hope authorities are able to quickly identify the origins of this disinformation and take appropriate action to limit its spread and impact.
Agreed. Tracing the sources of coordinated disinformation campaigns is critical to disrupting their efforts and protecting the public from manipulation.