Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Climate change disinformation experts convened at Yale on May 29, 2025, to discuss the growing challenge of misleading information hampering climate action worldwide.

The Yale Center for Environmental Communication hosted the high-profile panel discussion, bringing together leading researchers and specialists to examine how climate misinformation spreads and what can be done to combat it. The conversation, moderated by Yale Program on Climate Change Communication Director Dr. Anthony Leiserowitz, featured Philip Newell from Climate Action Against Disinformation, Cristina López from social media intelligence firm Graphika, and Dr. Sander van der Linden, a renowned psychologist from the University of Cambridge.

The panelists painted a concerning picture of how deliberate disinformation campaigns continue to undermine public understanding and policy progress on climate issues. “What we’re seeing isn’t just random misinformation, but coordinated efforts to sow doubt about established climate science,” explained Newell, whose organization tracks climate disinformation across platforms.

López, whose work at Graphika involves analyzing information networks, presented evidence showing how climate falsehoods often spread through sophisticated digital networks designed to amplify misleading content. “These aren’t just isolated posts anymore,” López noted. “We’re tracking networks that can push disinformation from fringe platforms into mainstream conversation within hours.”

Dr. van der Linden, known for his pioneering work on psychological inoculation against misinformation, highlighted which demographics appear most vulnerable to climate disinformation. “There are certain psychological patterns that make some groups more susceptible,” he explained. “But we’re also finding promising evidence that pre-bunking techniques—essentially warning people about misleading tactics before they encounter them—can significantly reduce the effectiveness of disinformation.”

The timing of the discussion is particularly relevant as global climate policy negotiations face increasing headwinds from well-funded opposition campaigns. Recent studies have documented a 300% increase in climate disinformation across social media platforms in the past eighteen months, correlating with key international climate summits and domestic policy debates.

The experts emphasized that climate disinformation has evolved beyond simply denying that climate change exists. Modern tactics include exaggerating the costs of renewable energy transitions, promoting conspiracy theories about climate scientists, and suggesting that individual countries need not act until others do more.

“What makes this particularly challenging is that the sources have become more sophisticated,” Leiserowitz explained. “We’re no longer just dealing with obvious industry-funded think tanks. Today’s disinformation often comes packaged through seemingly independent influencers and artificial grassroots movements.”

The panel discussed several promising countermeasures, including enhanced media literacy programs, improved platform policies around climate content, and better collaboration between scientists, journalists, and policymakers. López highlighted successful case studies where coordinated responses to disinformation campaigns effectively limited their reach and impact.

The Yale event comes at a critical juncture for climate action. With global temperatures continuing to rise and extreme weather events becoming more frequent, the stakes of public understanding and policy support have never been higher.

“The battle against climate disinformation is fundamentally about ensuring democratic processes can function properly,” van der Linden emphasized. “When the public and policymakers can’t access accurate information about such a critical issue, it undermines our ability to make informed decisions.”

The panelists concluded by calling for increased resources for monitoring and countering climate disinformation, suggesting that both governmental and private sector investment will be necessary to address the scale of the challenge.

Yale’s climate communication center plans to release a comprehensive report based on the discussion, including practical recommendations for journalists, platforms, educators, and policymakers confronting climate disinformation. The center has established itself as a leading voice in climate communication research, regularly publishing influential studies on public climate attitudes and effective messaging strategies.

The full discussion is available to view on the Yale Center for Environmental Communication’s website and YouTube channel.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

9 Comments

  1. Linda Hernandez on

    As an investor in mining and energy stocks, I’m concerned about how climate misinformation could impact public sentiment and policy decisions that affect our industry. Hoping the panel offers guidance on how companies can proactively address this challenge.

  2. Concerning to hear about the scale and coordination of climate disinformation campaigns. Curious to understand the psychological drivers behind why such misinformation resonates with some audiences.

    • Yes, the psychology behind why climate misinformation spreads is an important angle to explore. Understanding human biases and information processing is key to developing effective counter-strategies.

  3. Patricia Martinez on

    Glad to see leading researchers and specialists come together to tackle this issue. Look forward to learning more about the latest tactics used to spread climate disinformation and effective ways to combat it.

  4. Concerning to learn about the coordinated efforts to undermine climate science. Appreciate the panelists shining a light on this challenge and hope their discussion leads to impactful solutions.

  5. Liam Hernandez on

    As someone invested in mining and energy, I’m curious to understand how climate misinformation affects public perception and policy in these sectors. Hoping the panel offers practical advice for companies to address this proactively.

    • That’s a great point. Companies in extractive industries will need to be proactive in countering climate misinformation that could impact their operations and social license.

  6. Elijah Hernandez on

    Glad to see experts coming together to address this critical issue. Combating climate disinformation is vital for driving real action on climate change. Looking forward to hearing their insights on effective strategies.

  7. Appreciate the experts shining a spotlight on this critical issue. Combating climate disinformation is essential for driving meaningful progress on environmental action. Looking forward to learning about innovative approaches discussed at the panel.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.