Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Trump Administration Dismantles State Department’s Foreign Disinformation Monitoring Office

The Trump administration has shut down the State Department’s last remaining office dedicated to monitoring foreign disinformation campaigns, a move that experts warn leaves America vulnerable to information warfare from adversaries.

The Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (R/FIMI) hub, which focused exclusively on tracking foreign state-level disinformation attacks targeting other countries, has been eliminated as part of a broader effort by the administration to dismantle what it describes as government overreach in monitoring speech.

“Over the last decade, Americans have been slandered, fired, charged, and even jailed for simply voicing their opinions,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared on social media platform X on Wednesday. “That ends today.”

Rubio criticized the office, formerly known as the Global Engagement Center (GEC), claiming it “cost taxpayers more than $50 million per year and actively silenced and censored the voices of Americans they were supposed to be serving.” This stance represents a significant shift for Rubio, who had previously emphasized the importance of countering Chinese disinformation during his own confirmation hearing.

The closure follows a presidential executive order on “countering censorship and restoring freedom of speech” that frames previous anti-misinformation efforts as government infringement on constitutionally protected speech rights.

Intelligence experts and former officials have expressed alarm over the decision. James Rubin, former special envoy and coordinator for the Global Engagement Center, characterized the move as “the functional equivalent of unilateral disarmament.”

“If we remove our defenses against Russian and Chinese information warfare, it’s just to their advantage,” Rubin warned. During his tenure, Rubin had attempted to address Republican skepticism about the office by emphasizing its strictly foreign-focused mandate, but those efforts ultimately proved unsuccessful.

The elimination leaves the State Department without dedicated resources to counter increasingly sophisticated foreign government disinformation campaigns at a time when adversaries are dramatically scaling up such efforts. According to GEC estimates, Russia reportedly spends approximately $1.5 billion annually on foreign influence operations, Iran’s primary propaganda arm had a $1.26 billion budget in 2022, and China invests “billions of dollars annually” in similar activities.

Senator Jeanne Shaheen, ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, condemned the closure, stating that “Moscow and Beijing celebrate each time this administration dismantles another critical foreign policy tool.” She added, “The president is completely ceding the global information space to our adversaries, who are only too happy to fill the void with anti-American propaganda.”

Acting Undersecretary Darren Beattie reportedly informed staff that the office would be eliminated and all positions terminated. The approximately 40 employees will be placed on administrative leave and dismissed within 30 days, according to State Department sources who spoke to MIT Technology Review.

Beattie’s oversight of the closure brings additional controversy to the situation. He had previously been fired as a speechwriter during Trump’s first administration for attending a white nationalist conference and has promoted theories suggesting FBI involvement in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

R/FIMI was created as a successor to the GEC after Republicans in Congress blocked the reauthorization of the Obama-era office’s $61 million budget in December. During its existence, the GEC had developed several significant capabilities and achievements, including AI models to detect deepfakes, exposing Russian propaganda efforts targeting Latin American public opinion on the Ukraine conflict, and publishing detailed reports on Russian and Chinese disinformation operations.

One of the GEC’s most notable successes was exposing the Kremlin-backed “African initiative,” a plan to undermine U.S. influence across Africa by spreading conspiracy theories about U.S.-funded health programs. More recently, in September 2024, the Justice Department indicted two employees of RT, a Russian state-owned media outlet, after investigations uncovered a vast military procurement network supplying Russian forces in Ukraine through online crowdfunding platforms.

The dissolution of America’s formal apparatus for monitoring foreign disinformation comes at a time when digital information manipulation techniques are becoming increasingly sophisticated and prevalent in global affairs, raising concerns about the nation’s preparedness to counter such threats in the future.

Verify This Yourself

Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently

Reverse Image Search

Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts

Ask Our AI About This Claim

Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis

👋 Hi! I can help you understand this fact-check better. Ask me anything about this claim, related context, or how to verify similar content.

Related Fact-Checks

See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims

Loading fact-checks...

Want More Verification Tools?

Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools

21 Comments

  1. Jennifer Lopez on

    I’m concerned that this move will leave the US more vulnerable to foreign influence operations. Robust monitoring and response mechanisms are essential to protect democratic institutions and processes.

  2. While I appreciate the focus on free speech, this move seems to overlook the very real dangers posed by foreign disinformation campaigns. Robust monitoring and response capabilities are essential for national security.

  3. Patricia T. Brown on

    This is a worrying step backwards in the fight against foreign disinformation. Effective monitoring and response mechanisms are vital for protecting the integrity of information and democratic processes.

  4. While I understand the administration’s perspective on free speech, the risks of unchecked foreign disinformation seem to far outweigh any benefits of this decision. Dismantling this office is a concerning development.

    • Robert Williams on

      Agreed. Disinformation can have serious consequences, undermining public trust, political discourse, and national security. A more balanced approach is needed to address this complex challenge.

  5. While I appreciate the Secretary’s perspective on free speech, I’m not convinced this is the right approach. Disinformation can have very real and harmful consequences that need to be addressed.

    • Linda B. Martin on

      Agreed. Unchecked disinformation can undermine public trust, manipulate political discourse, and pose national security risks. A more balanced approach is needed.

  6. John Hernandez on

    I’m curious to hear more about the justification for this decision. What specific concerns led the administration to dismantle this office? The potential risks seem to outweigh the stated benefits.

    • Exactly. More transparency around the rationale and potential risks/mitigation strategies would be helpful to fully understand the implications of this change.

  7. Oliver D. Brown on

    This is a concerning development. Disinformation from foreign adversaries is a critical threat that requires a vigilant, coordinated response. Dismantling this office leaves the US more vulnerable to information warfare tactics.

    • Exactly. Effective countering of foreign disinformation should be a top national priority, not an area for budget cuts or office closures.

  8. William Williams on

    This is concerning. Monitoring and countering foreign disinformation campaigns is essential for national security. Dismantling this office leaves the US vulnerable to adversaries’ information warfare tactics.

    • James W. Jackson on

      I agree. Disinformation can have devastating real-world consequences, and we need robust mechanisms to identify and respond to it.

  9. This decision seems shortsighted. Effective countering of foreign disinformation campaigns should be a key national priority, not an area for budget cuts or office closures.

    • Isabella Miller on

      Absolutely. Disinformation is a complex, evolving threat that demands sustained, coordinated efforts to address. Dismantling this office is a concerning step in the wrong direction.

  10. This is a disappointing step backwards in the fight against foreign disinformation. Reliable information is crucial for an informed citizenry and healthy democracy.

  11. Patricia V. Martinez on

    It’s concerning to see the administration take this stance. Disinformation from foreign actors is a serious threat that requires a dedicated, vigilant response. This move seems to deprioritize that critical work.

  12. While free speech is important, this move seems to prioritize that over safeguarding the integrity of information. Disinformation can undermine democratic processes and public trust.

    • That’s a fair point. There needs to be a balance between protecting free speech and guarding against malicious foreign interference.

  13. Lucas G. Brown on

    I’m curious to learn more about the administration’s rationale for this decision. Dismantling the office responsible for countering foreign disinformation campaigns seems to increase the risks to the US.

    • Agreed. More transparency around the justification and potential mitigation strategies would help better understand the implications of this change.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved. Designed By Sawah Solutions.