Listen to the article
Solar industry experts have swiftly responded to what they describe as dangerous misinformation about solar panel longevity and environmental impact that continues to circulate online from fossil fuel industry leaders.
A post from September 2023 by Nick DeIuliis, CEO of natural gas company CNX Resources, recently resurfaced in renewable energy discussions on social media platforms. DeIuliis claimed that solar panels become inefficient after just 15 years, require disposal, and produce waste “300 times more harmful than nuclear waste” that often gets shipped to developing nations.
Solar experts and industry professionals have united to refute these assertions with evidence-based corrections. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, modern solar panels typically maintain efficiency for 25 to 35 years—significantly longer than DeIuliis suggested. Furthermore, solar panels are primarily composed of aluminum and glass, materials that rank among the most recyclable in the world.
“What utter nonsense,” wrote one commenter on Reddit, where the community has been actively countering the claims. Another noted that solar panels are “95% recyclable materials. Many quite valuable,” highlighting the economic incentive for proper recycling rather than disposal.
The solar recycling infrastructure is also more robust than portrayed in DeIuliis’s comments. The Department of Energy reports that more than 30 dedicated solar recycling facilities currently operate across the United States, with that number expected to grow as the industry matures and more installations reach end-of-life status.
Industry watchers note that misinformation about solar technology often originates from representatives of competing energy sectors, particularly fossil fuel executives like DeIuliis, whose company has significant financial interests in natural gas extraction through hydraulic fracturing.
The timing of this information battle coincides with a crucial period for renewable energy adoption. With the federal solar tax credit of 30% scheduled to expire on December 31, many homeowners are considering solar installations to capture these incentives while they remain available.
For consumers navigating these conflicting claims, resources like EnergySage offer comparison tools to evaluate solar quotes from vetted contractors. The platform estimates that average homeowners can save up to $10,000 on installations through federal incentives. Their state-by-state mapping tool provides localized cost and savings information to help consumers make informed decisions.
Alternative financing options are also expanding the solar market. Palmetto’s LightReach program, for instance, offers zero-down solar leasing that allows households to benefit from solar energy without the substantial upfront investment. Industry analysts note that pairing solar installations with heat pumps, as companies like Mitsubishi promote, can further maximize energy efficiency and cost savings.
The recycling challenge for solar panels is real but manageable, experts stress. Unlike the claims in DeIuliis’s post, the industry has developed standardized procedures for safely handling end-of-life solar equipment. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) has established a national recycling program that partners with manufacturers and installers to ensure responsible disposal practices.
As solar adoption continues to accelerate—with installations reaching record levels in the past year—the infrastructure for managing the technology throughout its lifecycle continues to develop in parallel, further undermining claims about unmanageable waste issues.
For the millions of Americans considering clean energy transitions, experts recommend consulting multiple sources and seeking information from energy-neutral organizations rather than relying on claims from those with clear financial interests in competing technologies.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


16 Comments
Ah, another case of an industry leader trying to discredit renewable energy to protect their own interests. I’m glad the solar experts stepped up to correct the record.
Yes, it’s a familiar tactic unfortunately. But it’s heartening to see the solar community rally together to counter this misinformation with facts and data.
It’s disappointing to see a fossil fuel CEO spreading misinformation about solar power. But I’m glad the solar industry is standing up and setting the record straight.
Agreed. We need reliable, unbiased information to make informed decisions about our energy future, not misleading propaganda from vested interests.
The solar industry’s swift response to these false claims is commendable. Providing the actual data on solar panel longevity and recyclability is critical to countering misinformation.
Absolutely. Facts and science should always take precedence over self-serving narratives, especially when it comes to important energy and environmental issues.
This is a good example of how the renewable energy sector needs to be proactive in countering disinformation. Kudos to the solar experts for their fact-based response.
Absolutely. Transparency and scientific integrity should be the foundation for any honest discussion about the pros and cons of different energy technologies.
These false claims about solar panel longevity and waste are quite alarming. I’m glad the solar industry is taking them seriously and providing evidence-based rebuttals.
Absolutely. Spreading disinformation, especially around critical environmental issues, is irresponsible and dangerous. The solar experts are right to set the record straight.
I’m glad to see the solar industry refuting these false claims so quickly. It’s important to combat misinformation with facts, especially on critical environmental issues.
Agreed. The public deserves accurate, unbiased information to make informed choices about our energy future. Kudos to the solar experts for setting the record straight.
Interesting rebuttal to the fracking CEO’s misleading claims. Solar experts are right to set the record straight with facts. Panels have much longer lifespans and recyclability than that CEO suggested.
Yes, it’s important to counter disinformation with accurate, evidence-based information. The solar industry is making great strides in sustainability.
It’s concerning to see a fossil fuel industry leader making such dubious claims about solar energy. I’m glad the solar community is united in swiftly refuting this misinformation.
Yes, it’s important that the public has access to accurate, unbiased information to make informed decisions about our energy future. Kudos to the solar experts for their fact-based response.