Listen to the article
Japan’s election season has been marred by a surge in online misinformation and disinformation spreading across social media platforms, raising concerns about the integrity of the upcoming House of Representatives election.
Experts note that the problem has intensified with the evolution of generative artificial intelligence technologies, which now enable virtually anyone to create convincing fake videos and manipulated images with minimal technical expertise.
In mid-January, a doctored image featuring Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi with unnaturally altered facial features circulated widely on X (formerly Twitter). The image, which garnered over 3.6 million views, was accompanied by text claiming, “Sanae Takaichi’s appearance speaks to the darkness and terror within her heart”—a clear attempt to damage her public perception.
Similarly, a deceptively edited video clip of Centrist Reform Alliance co-leader Tetsuo Saito received more than 800,000 views. The clip showed Saito saying, “There are things more important than humans,” but deliberately omitted his immediate follow-up statement, “We don’t subscribe to such a philosophy.” The selective editing significantly distorted his message and political stance.
Another fabricated video that gained viral status portrayed opposition party leaders apparently dancing during their campaign broadcast, undermining the seriousness of their political message.
While political satire has a long-standing tradition in democratic discourse, these recent examples represent a more insidious trend: the deliberate dissemination of false information designed to deceive voters and manipulate public opinion. If left unchecked, such manipulation threatens to undermine electoral fairness—the cornerstone of Japan’s democratic process.
The structural problem lies within social media’s fundamental business model. Platforms reward content that generates high engagement regardless of accuracy or societal impact. Content creators can monetize sensational posts through advertising revenue, creating a perverse incentive to produce provocative—often false—content without consideration for the broader societal damage.
Last spring, Japan implemented the Information Distribution Platform Law, which requires major platform operators to promptly address deletion requests from individuals who claim they have been harmed by specific posts. However, the law has significant limitations: platform operators maintain sole discretion over whether to remove content, and they are not required to publicly disclose their reasoning for such decisions.
Political observers suggest that both ruling and opposition parties should consider strengthening regulations governing social media content during elections. One proposed measure involves restricting the monetization of political content during official campaign periods, potentially reducing the financial incentives behind creating inflammatory or misleading election-related content.
As Japan approaches this crucial election, voters are urged to exercise critical thinking when consuming online information. Election experts recommend verifying claims through official channels such as government election bulletins, party websites, and traditional news sources before forming opinions or making voting decisions.
The proliferation of election misinformation in Japan reflects a global challenge facing democracies in the digital age. As technology continues to advance, the ease with which deceptive content can be created and disseminated threatens to outpace regulatory frameworks designed to maintain electoral integrity.
For democracy to function effectively, voters must have access to accurate information when making decisions at the ballot box. The current situation highlights the delicate balance between free expression and protecting the democratic process from deliberate manipulation—a challenge that Japanese society must address as it prepares for the upcoming election.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

12 Comments
I’m curious to learn more about the specific measures being taken in Japan to address this disinformation crisis. What kinds of policy responses or technological solutions are being explored?
That’s a great question. Japan’s government and tech companies will likely need to collaborate closely to develop effective strategies. Transparency and public education will be key.
The examples of the doctored images and videos are really troubling. This kind of manipulation can have serious consequences for the integrity of elections and public discourse.
Absolutely. Voters need to be very discerning and fact-check claims, especially those spread on social media. Platforms also have a responsibility to better detect and remove this content.
This is a sobering development, but I’m hopeful that with increased awareness and proactive measures, we can find ways to mitigate the spread of malicious disinformation online.
The escalation of disinformation fueled by generative AI is a complex challenge that will require a multifaceted response. Strengthening digital literacy, improving platform moderation, and enforcing accountability will all be important.
Well said. A comprehensive strategy involving government, tech companies, and the public will be needed to combat this threat to democratic institutions and market integrity.
As someone who follows developments in the mining and commodities sector, I’m concerned about how this disinformation could potentially impact investor sentiment and market stability.
That’s a really good point. Misinformation and manipulation could sway opinions on mining companies, energy policy, and related financial markets. Careful scrutiny of online claims is essential.
This issue goes beyond just politics – the ability to create convincing fakes has serious implications for industries like mining, energy, and finance as well. Rigorous verification will be crucial.
This is a concerning trend as misinformation and doctored content can sway public opinion and undermine faith in the democratic process. The speed and scale at which this can spread online is alarming.
Agreed. Generative AI makes it far too easy to create convincing fakes. Robust fact-checking and media literacy efforts will be crucial to combat this threat.