Listen to the article
In a move that signals further tightening of digital control, Russian authorities are considering the implementation of a single user identifier system across all internet platforms, according to a report from Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation (CCD).
The proposed system would create unchangeable digital IDs linked to users’ phone numbers, ostensibly to “more accurately count the audience” of online platforms. The initiative comes amid growing concerns about increasing surveillance in Russia’s digital landscape.
Russia’s Ministry of Digital Development has framed the proposal as beneficial for the advertising market and digital statistics collection, claiming that all data would be anonymized and encrypted during transmission. However, the Ukrainian CCD characterizes the move as “another step towards total digital control” rather than a benign statistical tool.
“An unchangeable ID, linked to a phone number, actually creates a single digital profile of a person—with the ability to track their activity on social networks, media, online cinemas and other services,” the CCD stated in its assessment of the initiative.
This development follows a pattern of increasing digital surveillance measures in Russia. The country has already announced plans to launch a unified IMEI (International Mobile Equipment Identity) register beginning in 2027, which would link mobile devices’ unique identifiers to subscriber numbers. By 2028, only devices registered in this state database would be permitted to connect to mobile networks, effectively transforming mobile communications into “an element of state surveillance,” according to critics.
Digital rights experts view these developments with alarm. The proposed system would allow Russian authorities unprecedented visibility into citizens’ online behaviors across multiple platforms simultaneously. While many countries maintain some form of digital monitoring capabilities, the comprehensive scope of Russia’s proposed system represents a significant escalation.
“What we’re seeing is the construction of a ‘digital Gulag’ under the guise of creating convenience for businesses,” explained one cybersecurity analyst who requested anonymity due to security concerns. “The ability to link every online interaction to a specific individual creates a surveillance infrastructure that far exceeds traditional monitoring methods.”
The technological framework necessary for such a system would require cooperation from internet service providers and platform operators within Russia. International platforms operating in Russia already face stringent requirements to store Russian users’ data on servers within the country’s borders, making compliance with additional identification requirements a likely extension of existing policies.
For ordinary Russian citizens, the implications could be far-reaching. Anonymous or pseudonymous internet use would become increasingly difficult, potentially chilling free expression and political dissent. The system would also create valuable datasets potentially vulnerable to security breaches or misuse.
The move comes as Russia continues to develop its “sovereign internet” infrastructure, designed to allow the country’s internet to function independently from the global network if necessary. This infrastructure includes equipment capable of deep packet inspection and traffic filtering at the internet service provider level.
Market analysts note that the advertising justification offered by authorities does have some technical merit—unified identification systems do improve advertising attribution and measurement—but question whether commercial benefits outweigh privacy concerns.
The Ukrainian CCD’s assessment concludes with a stark prediction about Russia’s trajectory, suggesting that “Putin’s Russia will not return to the civilized world” and that democratic governance would only become possible through the collapse of the Russian Federation.
As digital rights continue to evolve globally, Russia’s proposed identification system represents one of the more comprehensive attempts by a major nation to implement persistent digital tracking of its citizens’ online activities, raising significant concerns about privacy, freedom of expression, and the future of internet governance.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
From a mining/commodities perspective, I wonder how this type of digital control could impact the free flow of information and data sharing within these industries. Increased surveillance may hinder open communication and collaboration.
That’s an excellent point. Robust information sharing and transparency are crucial for efficient commodity markets. Excessive state control over digital activity could disrupt normal business operations and data exchange within the mining sector.
While the government claims this is for better advertising metrics and statistics, the reality is that it will grant unprecedented access to track citizens’ online activities. This raises serious questions about how this data could be misused.
Exactly. Purported benefits like improved digital advertising should not override the fundamental rights to privacy and digital freedom. Russia must be transparent about the true intentions behind this initiative.
While improved digital metrics may seem beneficial, the underlying motive of tightening state control over citizens’ online activities is highly concerning. This move appears to prioritize surveillance over individual privacy and freedoms.
I agree. Any purported benefits must be weighed against the serious risks to civil liberties. Russia should reconsider this proposal and focus on protecting the digital rights of its citizens rather than expanding state control.
From the perspective of the mining and commodities industries, this type of expansive digital control could have serious ramifications. Increased state monitoring and surveillance may impede the free flow of information and data sharing that is crucial for efficient market operations.
That’s an excellent point. Transparency and open communication are vital for the smooth functioning of commodity markets. This proposal by Russia has the potential to disrupt normal business practices and information exchange within the mining sector, which is deeply concerning.
While the stated goals of improved digital metrics may seem innocuous, the underlying intention of tightening state control over citizens’ online activities is highly problematic. This move represents a dangerous erosion of individual privacy and digital freedoms.
I agree completely. Any purported benefits must be weighed against the serious risks to civil liberties. Russia should reconsider this proposal and focus on protecting the fundamental rights of its citizens in the digital sphere rather than expanding state power and surveillance.
The characterization of this as a move towards “total digital control” is quite concerning. Linking immutable digital IDs to phone numbers essentially creates detailed profiles on individuals, which could be a serious breach of privacy.
I share your concerns. This level of state control over citizens’ online activities is a dangerous precedent that threatens basic civil liberties. Russia must reconsider this proposal and prioritize protecting digital rights.
This move by Russia to create a single user identifier system seems concerning. Linking digital IDs to phone numbers could enable widespread surveillance and digital control over citizens, which is worrying for individual privacy and freedoms.
I agree, this appears to be another step towards increasing state control and monitoring of the digital landscape in Russia. Anonymized data collection can still be exploited for nefarious purposes.
This news is quite troubling. Linking immutable digital IDs to phone numbers creates detailed user profiles that could be exploited for comprehensive surveillance and control. The implications for privacy and freedom of expression are deeply worrying.
Absolutely. This initiative goes far beyond mere data collection and represents a significant erosion of individual rights in the digital sphere. Russia must be held accountable for these concerning moves towards expanding state power over its citizens.