Listen to the article
Argentina’s Milei Launches “Official Response Office” to Combat Alleged Media Misinformation
President Javier Milei’s administration has established a new “Official Response Office” aimed at confronting what it claims is fake news and inaccurate reporting by journalists. The initiative, announced Thursday via a new social media account on X, closely follows a similar move by U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration, which recently launched its own “Rapid Response 47” account.
Rather than functioning as a physical government office, the initiative operates primarily through social media, with its stated mission to “combat disinformation by providing more information” and help citizens distinguish between “facts and narratives.” The account will publicly respond to content the Executive branch deems false and expose what it considers “operations” conducted by critics in the media.
In its inaugural statement, the administration insisted this approach doesn’t threaten free expression: “This decision is unequivocal: we are adding an official voice to debunk operations – the opposite of censorship. The right to freedom of expression is sacred to this administration.”
The account’s first post signaled a confrontational stance, defining its role as “actively debunking lies, pointing out specific falsehoods, and laying bare the operations of the media and the political caste.” It added that “simply informing is not enough if disinformation advances without a response.”
Government officials linked the initiative to their earlier withdrawal of state advertising funds, known as “pauta,” which had previously been distributed at the administration’s discretion. They claimed that since ceasing to “finance narratives through state advertising,” critical voices and alleged falsehoods have become “louder,” necessitating this response mechanism.
However, local media investigations have revealed that such government funding still continues, albeit redirected through state companies like energy giant YPF and national airline Aerolíneas Argentinas, though at significantly reduced levels.
The administration maintains the account will not attempt to “convince or impose a viewpoint,” but rather provide citizens with tools to differentiate between factual information and biased narratives. “Democracy is not strengthened by tolerating lies, but by exposing them,” the statement concluded.
Critics quickly labeled the initiative the “Ministry of Truth” – a reference to George Orwell’s dystopian novel “Nineteen Eighty-Four,” in which a government department manipulates facts and rewrites history to support the ruling party’s agenda.
Milei’s relationship with the press has been consistently contentious since taking office in December 2023. He frequently targets journalists on social media, branding critical outlets as corrupt and even stating that Argentines “don’t hate journalists enough.” The president has yet to hold a single press conference, restricting his media interactions to a small circle of approved journalists and prestigious international outlets.
Media freedom organizations have expressed growing concern. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) noted in its 2025 press freedom ranking that Milei has attempted to “stigmatize” journalists, adding that “insults, defamation, and threats from Javier Milei’s administration toward journalists and media critical of his regime have become commonplace.” The organization also highlighted concerns about media ownership concentration and the precarious state of journalism in Argentina.
Several prominent organizations, including Argentina’s National Academy of Journalism, the Inter American Press Association, ADEPA, and FOPEA, have warned about the potential dangers of Milei’s anti-media rhetoric.
Government officials routinely ignore inquiries from certain media outlets, including the Times and other publications from Editorial Perfil SA, further restricting press access and transparency.
The establishment of this “Official Response Office” marks another chapter in the increasingly strained relationship between Milei’s administration and the press, raising further questions about the future of media freedom and government accountability in Argentina.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


16 Comments
This ‘rapid response’ office is a concerning development. While tackling disinformation is important, the government directly refuting media reports is a dangerous path that could undermine press freedom and open discourse. Transparency and fact-based communication should be the priority.
I agree, this initiative has the potential to erode the independence of the media. The government should find ways to improve access to accurate information without interfering with the press’s ability to report freely and hold leaders accountable.
Hmm, this ‘rapid response’ office set up to counter ‘fake news’ claims is a worrying development. I understand the desire to combat misinformation, but the government directly refuting media reports is a slippery slope that threatens press freedom. A more transparent, fact-based approach would be better.
Well said. While tackling disinformation is important, this initiative seems to cross a line. The government should focus on improving access to reliable information, not directly confronting media coverage, no matter how unfavorable it may be.
Hmm, this ‘rapid response’ office idea is certainly intriguing, but I worry it could be used to simply silence critical reporting. A free and independent press is essential for a healthy democracy. Transparency and fact-based dialogue are the best approach.
I agree. While tackling disinformation is important, this initiative has the potential to be abused and undermine press freedom. The government should find ways to improve access to accurate information without directly confronting media reports.
This ‘rapid response’ initiative sounds concerning. While combating disinformation is important, I worry about the government directly intervening in media coverage. Transparency and an independent press are vital for a healthy democracy.
I agree, this initiative has the potential to undermine press freedom and open discourse. The government should focus on improving access to accurate, factual information rather than directly refuting media reports.
While combating disinformation is important, I’m concerned about the potential for abuse with this ‘rapid response’ office. Transparent, fact-based communication is ideal, but directly refuting media reports raises red flags for me.
I share your concern. This initiative seems to blur the line between providing accurate information and interfering with independent journalism. The government should focus on improving access to facts, not dismissing unfavorable coverage.
This ‘rapid response’ office set up to counter ‘fake news’ claims is concerning. I appreciate the goal of combating misinformation, but the government directly refuting media reports is a dangerous precedent that threatens press freedom and open discourse. Transparency and fact-based communication should be the priority.
I agree completely. While tackling disinformation is important, this initiative has the potential to undermine the independence of the media. The government should find ways to improve access to accurate information without interfering with the press’s ability to report freely and hold leaders accountable.
Establishing a government office to counter ‘fake news’ claims is concerning. I understand the desire to combat misinformation, but directly refuting media reports raises serious questions about press freedom and government overreach. A more transparent, fact-based approach would be better.
Well said. While the goal of combating disinformation is noble, this initiative seems to cross a line. The government should focus on improving access to reliable information, not directly confronting media coverage, no matter how unfavorable it may be.
Establishing a government office to respond to ‘fake news’ claims is a slippery slope. Reputable journalism plays a crucial role in holding leaders accountable. I hope this doesn’t become a way to simply dismiss unfavorable coverage.
Well said. Government efforts to counter perceived misinformation should be done with extreme caution to avoid infringing on the media’s ability to report freely and objectively.