Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In the wake of immigration-related protests across Los Angeles, a dangerous wave of mis- and disinformation has flooded social media and news outlets, complicating an already tense situation. The demonstrations, which have erupted in specific areas of the sprawling metropolitan region, have been met with tear gas and rubber bullets from law enforcement outside detention facilities.

The information landscape has become increasingly murky as events rapidly evolve on the ground. Even government officials have contributed to the problem by sharing conspiracy theories on their social media platforms. Intelligence agencies have identified Russian and Chinese state actors amplifying false narratives to further inflame tensions.

Several prominent examples of disinformation have gained traction online. One widespread misconception suggests the entire Los Angeles region is engulfed in chaos, when in reality protests have been limited to relatively small areas of the vast urban center. The Department of Homeland Security has spread false claims that Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum encouraged demonstrations against ICE raids – allegations she has firmly denied as “absolutely false” while reposting her original statements urging Mexican-Americans to act peacefully.

Social media platforms have seen viral posts falsely claiming Mexico is considering military intervention in Los Angeles, further stoking tensions. Images of burning police cars circulating on X (formerly Twitter) have been revealed as recycled photos from 2020 protests, not current events. Another conspiracy theory involving strategically placed piles of bricks allegedly staged by “Democrat militants” and “Soros funded organizations” has been debunked, with the images traced back to a building materials wholesaler in Malaysia.

President Donald Trump has used these tensions as justification for deploying Marines and National Guard soldiers. By characterizing the protests as violent or foreign-influenced uprisings, the administration has framed them as existential threats warranting extraordinary military responses.

The situation has been exacerbated by increasing restrictions on press access. Multiple journalists have reported being detained, forcibly removed from protest areas, or injured by law enforcement. CNN reporters Kyung Lah and Jason Carroll were ordered to leave protest zones by LAPD, with Carroll briefly detained and warned of arrest if he returned. An Australian Nine News reporter was struck by a rubber bullet while reporting on location.

PEN America has joined 28 press freedom organizations in condemning these attacks on journalists, emphasizing that reporting is not a crime but a vital function in a democratic society. The organization warns that the combination of disinformation and press restrictions poses a fundamental threat to free expression and democracy.

Media experts recommend several strategies to combat the spread of false information. First, pause before sharing content, particularly if it triggers strong emotional reactions. Confirmation bias often leads people to accept information that aligns with their existing beliefs without sufficient scrutiny.

Visual content requires special attention. Photos and videos can be altered, taken out of context, or drawn from entirely different events. Before sharing such content, consider using reverse image search tools like TinEye or Google to verify authenticity.

Verifying news sources has become increasingly important with the proliferation of “pink slime” news sites – deceptive outlets with legitimate-sounding names designed to spread conspiracies and falsehoods. This problem has grown more sophisticated with generative AI creating convincing but fraudulent content across multiple media formats.

Media literacy advocates recommend following diverse, reputable news sources rather than relying solely on social media, where algorithms tend to amplify inflammatory content. Triangulating information from multiple credible sources provides a more complete picture of rapidly changing situations.

As tensions continue in Los Angeles, individuals are encouraged to be reliable information sources for their communities by offering corrections when necessary and amplifying accurate information. With most Americans considering friends and family their most trusted information sources, personal networks play a crucial role in combating the spread of dangerous misinformation during this critical period.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

14 Comments

  1. Jennifer Davis on

    The use of force against protesters is a concerning development that warrants close scrutiny. While the full context may not be clear, any reports of disproportionate or unnecessary use of force should be investigated thoroughly and transparently.

  2. Lucas Martinez on

    I’m curious to learn more about the specific false claims that have gained traction online. Understanding the nature of the misinformation will be key to countering it effectively. Thoughtful, evidence-based analysis is needed to cut through the noise.

  3. I appreciate the Department of Homeland Security calling out the false claims about the Mexican president’s involvement. Verifying information from reliable sources is so critical, especially when emotions are running high. Thoughtful, nuanced reporting is key here.

  4. Oliver Jackson on

    Interesting to see the involvement of foreign state actors in amplifying false narratives around these protests. Speaks to the complex information landscape we’re navigating. Important to be discerning consumers of news and social media during fluid situations like this.

  5. William Hernandez on

    This is a complex issue with a lot of misinformation circulating. It’s important to rely on authoritative sources and fact-check claims before sharing. The protests seem to be focused in certain areas, not the entire city. Interested to see how the situation evolves.

  6. Interesting to see the role of foreign state actors in amplifying misinformation around these protests. Speaks to the complex, interconnected information landscape we’re navigating. Critical that the public remains discerning and relies on authoritative sources.

  7. This highlights the challenges of covering fast-moving events with a lot of conflicting information. Journalists will need to exercise caution to avoid inadvertently spreading misinformation, while still keeping the public informed. A delicate balance for sure.

  8. Immigration policy is a sensitive and politicized topic. While the protests are concerning, it’s crucial we avoid spreading unverified claims that could inflame tensions further. Fact-checking and nuanced reporting are needed to cut through the noise.

    • Robert J. Martin on

      Agreed. Misinformation often spreads rapidly online, making it harder to understand the true nature of events on the ground. Measured, evidence-based coverage is key to inform the public accurately.

  9. Lucas Williams on

    It’s concerning to hear about the use of tear gas and rubber bullets against protesters. While the full context isn’t clear, the use of force against civilians exercising their rights is always worrying. Hope the situation can be de-escalated through lawful, peaceful means.

  10. Mary D. Johnson on

    The involvement of government officials in spreading conspiracy theories is very troubling. That kind of behavior from authorities can seriously undermine public trust and confidence. Transparency and accountability will be essential to address this issue.

  11. The details around government officials sharing conspiracy theories is troubling. That kind of behavior from authorities can seriously undermine public trust. Fact-checking and transparency will be essential to counter misinformation from all sides.

  12. This is a sensitive and politically charged situation, so it’s important that reporting remains as objective and impartial as possible. Relying on verified facts from credible sources will be crucial to informing the public accurately.

  13. The scale and geographic scope of the protests is an important detail. Sensationalizing the situation or making broad claims about the entire city being in chaos is irresponsible and could further inflame tensions. Nuanced, fact-based reporting is vital.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.