Listen to the article
Latvian efforts against Russian disinformation have gained international attention as the Baltic nation continues to develop comprehensive countermeasures against foreign influence operations. Positioned on the frontlines of information warfare, Latvia has emerged as a leader in the fight against Kremlin-backed disinformation campaigns targeting Western democracies.
The country’s approach combines grassroots initiatives with institutional responses, drawing on its historical experience confronting Russian aggression. Within Latvia’s borders, a robust ecosystem of disinformation researchers, civil society organizations, and government agencies work collaboratively to identify and neutralize false narratives before they gain traction.
According to security experts, most disinformation circulating in Latvia can be traced back to Kremlin-affiliated sources. These campaigns typically follow predictable patterns, aiming to undermine public trust in NATO, the European Union, and other Western institutions while simultaneously enhancing Russia’s global standing and regional influence.
“Latvia’s experience with Russian disinformation tactics goes back decades, but the sophistication of these operations has increased significantly in recent years,” explains Monika Hanley, a former Fulbright Scholar at NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence and associate at The Center for Media Literacy.
In response to evolving threats, Latvia updated its Criminal Law in mid-2024, introducing provisions that specifically criminalize deepfake-style manipulation of political content. This legislative action reflects growing concerns about AI-generated content being used to influence electoral processes and public opinion.
Simultaneously, Latvia’s public-service broadcasting regulator implemented new restrictions on Russian-language programming. This contentious decision has sparked debate about balancing security concerns with language rights, particularly given Latvia’s significant Russian-speaking minority population. The move is currently under review by Latvia’s Constitutional Court, highlighting the complex legal and social dimensions of information security policies.
The Latvian government has also pursued high-profile legal cases against individuals allegedly involved in pro-Kremlin activities. In early 2025, authorities prosecuted a well-known pro-Kremlin activist, signaling the state’s commitment to addressing information threats through judicial means.
Gunta Sloga from the Baltic Centre for Media Excellence (BCME) notes that Latvia’s approach combines regulatory frameworks with community-based solutions. “What makes Latvia’s response effective is the multilayered approach. Government agencies, media organizations, civil society, and ordinary citizens all play important roles in building societal resilience against disinformation.”
Latvia’s strategic position as a NATO and EU member sharing a border with Russia has made it an important testing ground for disinformation tactics. Security analysts suggest that techniques deployed against Latvia often appear later in campaigns targeting larger Western democracies, making the country’s experiences particularly valuable for understanding evolving information threats.
The country hosts several internationally recognized centers of excellence focused on strategic communications and media literacy, including the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence in Riga. These institutions provide valuable research and training for professionals from across Europe and North America.
Media literacy initiatives have become increasingly prominent in Latvia’s education system, with programs designed to help students critically evaluate information sources from an early age. These efforts aim to build long-term societal resilience against manipulation campaigns.
As disinformation techniques continue to evolve, particularly with the rise of artificial intelligence tools, Latvia’s adaptive approach offers valuable insights for other democracies facing similar challenges. The country’s experience demonstrates that effective responses require coordination across government, civil society, and media sectors.
While Latvia’s countermeasures have shown promise, the challenge remains substantial. Disinformation campaigns targeting the country have demonstrated remarkable persistence and adaptability, requiring continuous refinement of defensive strategies.
Latvia’s ongoing efforts illustrate the complexity of protecting information spaces in democratic societies while preserving fundamental freedoms – a balance that countries worldwide increasingly struggle to maintain in an era of sophisticated information manipulation.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
It’s concerning to see the Kremlin’s continued efforts to undermine trust in Western institutions, even in the Baltic states. However, Latvia’s proactive stance is an encouraging sign that democracies can effectively push back against foreign influence operations.
The article provides a sobering reminder of the ongoing information warfare between Russia and the West. Latvia’s experience demonstrates the need for vigilance and adaptability in responding to ever-changing disinformation tactics.
Absolutely. Staying ahead of the curve and anticipating evolving disinformation narratives will be crucial for democracies to maintain public trust and resilience.
As a frontline state, Latvia’s insights into Russian disinformation tactics could be invaluable for other nations facing similar challenges. The article highlights the importance of coordinated, multilayered responses to this threat.
The article highlights the importance of public-private cooperation in combating disinformation. By leveraging the expertise of researchers, civil society, and government agencies, Latvia is taking a holistic approach to this growing threat.
Absolutely. A whole-of-society response is crucial to counter the complex and evolving tactics of state-backed disinformation campaigns. Latvia’s model could serve as a blueprint for other nations.
Interesting to see Latvia’s proactive approach to countering Russian disinformation. As a frontline state, their experience in this realm could provide valuable insights for other nations facing similar challenges.
I agree, Latvia’s comprehensive strategy to identify and neutralize false narratives is commendable. Sharing best practices internationally could strengthen democratic resilience against foreign influence operations.