Listen to the article
The U.S. State Department has barred five European citizens from entering the United States, accusing them of spearheading efforts to pressure technology companies into censoring or suppressing American viewpoints. The move represents the latest escalation in tensions between the Trump administration and European regulators over digital content moderation policies.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the visa restrictions, characterizing the targeted individuals as having led “organized efforts to coerce American platforms to censor, demonetize, and suppress American viewpoints they oppose.” He further described them as “radical activists and weaponized NGOs” that have advanced “censorship crackdowns by foreign states” specifically targeting American speakers and companies.
Among those facing visa bans is Thierry Breton, who served as the European Commissioner for the Internal Market from 2019 to 2024. Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy Sarah Rogers specifically labeled Breton as “a mastermind” behind the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA), a comprehensive regulatory framework aimed at combating online hate speech, misinformation, and disinformation.
In response to the visa ban, Breton posted on social media, “Is McCarthy’s witch hunt back?” – a reference to the anti-communist investigations led by U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s.
The other four individuals named by Rogers include Imran Ahmed, chief executive of the Centre for Countering Digital Hate; Josephine Ballon and Anna-Lena von Hodenberg, leaders of the German organization HateAid; and Clare Melford, who heads the Global Disinformation Index.
The visa restrictions are being implemented under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which generally prohibits those targeted from entering the United States. Some may also face removal proceedings if they are already within U.S. borders.
This action comes amid a broader diplomatic push by the Trump administration against European digital regulations. In recent months, U.S. diplomats have been directed to build opposition to the EU’s Digital Services Act, which Washington claims stifles free speech and imposes excessive costs on American technology companies. The DSA represents one of the world’s most ambitious attempts to regulate digital content, requiring platforms to take more aggressive action against illegal content and misinformation.
The administration’s National Security Strategy released earlier this month took aim at European leaders, accusing them of censoring free speech and suppressing opposition to immigration policies that it claimed risk “civilizational erasure” for the continent – language that signals a significant ideological divide between the current U.S. administration and European governments.
Clare Melford, one of those targeted, had previously stated in a 2024 video that she co-founded the Global Disinformation Index “to break the business model of harmful online content” by reviewing online news websites. The organization’s work enables advertisers to “choose whether or not they want to fund content that is polarizing and divisive and harmful, or whether they want to steer their advertising back towards more quality journalism.”
A spokesperson for the Global Disinformation Index condemned the U.S. action as “immoral, unlawful, and un-American,” describing it as “an authoritarian attack on free speech and an egregious act of government censorship.”
The practical implementation of these visa restrictions may be complicated by the Visa Waiver Program, which allows most Europeans to enter the U.S. without obtaining a visa. However, a U.S. official speaking on condition of anonymity indicated that the targeted individuals may have been flagged in the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), the online pre-clearance system operated by the Department of Homeland Security.
This diplomatic dispute highlights growing tensions between the United States and Europe over digital governance and speech regulation, with significant implications for transatlantic relations and the global technology industry.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
From a factual standpoint, it’s concerning to see the US restricting entry of European officials involved in digital regulation efforts. While the details are still emerging, this could have significant implications for transatlantic cooperation on technology policy and other areas. I’ll be following this story closely.
As someone interested in the mining and energy sectors, I’m curious to see how this diplomatic dispute might affect cooperation on critical minerals and low-carbon energy technologies. Geopolitical tensions often have ripple effects across different industries, so this bears watching.
That’s a good point. The mining and energy sectors are deeply intertwined with geopolitics, so any disruption in US-EU relations could have real consequences for the supply and development of key resources and technologies. It’s an important angle to consider.
As someone who follows the commodities and mining sector, I’m curious how this dispute over digital regulation might impact cooperation on other global issues like critical mineral supply chains. Tensions between the US and EU could have ripple effects across multiple industries.
That’s a thoughtful observation. Geopolitical tensions often have unintended consequences, so it will be important to monitor how this situation evolves and whether it spills over into other areas of economic cooperation.
I’m skeptical of the US government’s characterization of these European officials and activists as ‘radical’ and ‘weaponized.’ While I understand concerns over censorship, denying them entry seems like a heavy-handed response that could backfire. Transparent policymaking and open dialogue are important for addressing these complex issues.
I agree, the rhetoric from the US government seems quite inflammatory. A more measured, diplomatic approach would likely be more constructive in the long run, even if there are real disagreements to work through.
This is an interesting development in the ongoing tensions between the US and Europe over digital regulation. It’s concerning to see the US denying entry to European officials and activists, especially those involved in the EU’s Digital Services Act. I wonder how this will impact future cooperation on these important issues.
You raise a good point. The visa bans seem like an escalation that could further strain relations and hinder international cooperation on internet governance.