Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

The Central Elections Committee is set to convene next month to address growing concerns about artificial intelligence and digital threats to Israel’s electoral process ahead of the 2026 national vote. The unprecedented meeting will evaluate existing regulations and consider new protective measures to safeguard the democratic process in an era of rapidly evolving technology.

The initiative follows a formal request by Knesset member Eitan Ginzburg of the National Unity party, who urged Committee Chair and Supreme Court Deputy Chief Justice Noam Sohlberg to implement enhanced protections before Israel elects its 26th Knesset in October 2026.

The committee’s upcoming deliberations will cover a range of pressing issues including political content on social media platforms, AI-generated campaign materials, foreign interference in elections, and the potential appointment of a dedicated AI adviser to provide specialized guidance.

“We’ve entered a new era in digital and AI technology,” Ginzburg stated. “The challenges to safeguarding election integrity in this reality—especially when foreign entities seek to sway Israeli public opinion—demand special preparation and strategic responses.”

State Comptroller Matanyahu Englman added his voice to these concerns on Tuesday, issuing a stark warning that “the integrity of the elections is in danger.” He highlighted significant deficiencies in Israel’s preparedness for potential foreign influence operations targeting the 2026 elections and called for immediate action from both the government and the elections committee.

Two key issues will dominate the committee’s agenda. First, they will review regulations introduced in 2022 that require disclosure of the identity behind election advertisements. Ginzburg has proposed expanding these requirements across all digital platforms to combat disinformation and foreign meddling.

Second, and perhaps more critically, the committee will grapple with the unprecedented challenge of AI-driven political campaigns—expected to feature prominently for the first time in an Israeli election cycle.

“There is currently no regulation addressing AI in political campaigning,” Ginzburg warned in his appeal to the committee. He proposed two specific regulatory measures: mandatory clear labeling of AI-generated content and required disclosure of how artificial intelligence is used to micro-target voters and personalize campaign messaging.

The concerns reflect a global trend of democracies struggling to adapt electoral systems to rapidly evolving digital technologies. Ginzburg pointed to international precedents, including Romania’s decision last year to annul an election due to disinformation and foreign propaganda campaigns conducted through social media platforms.

Israel’s electoral system faces particular challenges given the country’s geopolitical position and history of being targeted by sophisticated disinformation campaigns. The Central Elections Committee will need to balance democratic openness with reasonable protections against manipulation, all while navigating a technological landscape that continues to evolve at a breakneck pace.

The committee is also expected to consider activating a public advisory panel tasked with reviewing election laws, bringing additional expertise to bear on these complex issues.

These developments come at a time when democracies worldwide are grappling with similar challenges. The United States, European Union, and other democratic nations have implemented varying approaches to addressing AI and digital threats to electoral integrity, from voluntary guidelines to strict regulatory frameworks.

For Israeli voters, the outcome of these deliberations could significantly impact how they receive political information during the 2026 campaign, with new disclosure requirements potentially reshaping how parties and candidates communicate their messages across traditional and emerging digital platforms.

As the meeting approaches, stakeholders from political parties, technology companies, and civil society organizations are expected to weigh in on these critical questions that stand at the intersection of technology, democracy, and national security.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

18 Comments

  1. Noah O. Miller on

    This is a timely and important issue. The increasing role of AI in politics raises many ethical and security concerns that deserve careful consideration.

    • Agreed. The committee’s work will have far-reaching implications for the future of Israel’s democratic processes.

  2. Lucas Hernandez on

    As AI and digital technologies continue to evolve, the need for robust safeguards to protect election integrity will only grow. I commend Israel for taking this issue seriously and convening this important meeting.

  3. The growing reliance on AI technology in political campaigns is a double-edged sword. While it can enhance engagement, it also creates new vulnerabilities that bad actors may exploit. Vigilance is key.

    • Jennifer Q. Hernandez on

      You raise a valid point. The use of AI must be carefully regulated to prevent malicious disinformation campaigns from undermining the democratic process.

  4. This is concerning news. Foreign meddling and AI disinformation pose serious threats to the integrity of Israel’s elections. Robust safeguards and specialized guidance will be critical to upholding the democratic process.

    • Agreed. Israel must take proactive steps to protect its elections from these evolving digital threats. Appointing an AI adviser could provide valuable expertise.

  5. Oliver C. Jones on

    The potential for AI to be weaponized for political gain is deeply concerning. I hope the committee’s deliberations result in effective policies to mitigate these risks and protect Israel’s democracy.

  6. Protecting election integrity in the digital age is a global challenge. I’m glad to see Israel taking proactive steps to address these threats and strengthen its democratic institutions.

    • Yes, Israel’s efforts could set an example for other nations grappling with similar issues. Transparent policymaking and public-private collaboration will be key.

  7. Patricia Williams on

    Safeguarding election integrity in the digital age is a complex challenge that demands a multifaceted approach. I’m glad to see the Central Elections Committee taking this issue seriously.

    • Absolutely. Comprehensive measures to address AI-generated content, foreign interference, and other emerging threats will be crucial for maintaining public trust in the electoral system.

  8. Foreign meddling in elections is a global problem that requires international cooperation to address. I’m curious to see what specific measures the committee proposes to counter these threats.

    • Good point. Coordination with allies and technology companies will likely be essential for developing comprehensive solutions.

  9. The intersection of technology, foreign interference, and electoral politics is a complex and concerning issue. I hope the committee’s work results in practical solutions that preserve the integrity of Israel’s democratic process.

    • James S. Moore on

      Me too. Balancing security needs with democratic principles will require careful deliberation and stakeholder engagement.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.