Listen to the article
Brazil’s Democracy Under Siege: How Disinformation Campaigns Create Persistent Political Instability
For at least a decade, Brazil has been experiencing a continuous process of political and institutional destabilization. This phenomenon isn’t accidental but rather represents a planned, persistent, and silent dynamic connected to broader contemporary geopolitical disputes.
In December 2025, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen issued a stark warning: Western democracies face systematic campaigns of information manipulation. According to the European leader, 21st-century conflicts begin not with military action but with lies, institutional sabotage, and deliberate distortion of public opinion.
This process is already intensely manifesting in Brazil. The country experiences geopolitical pressure not through traditional military means but through more insidious channels—social media, messaging apps, and recurring cycles of fake news designed to undermine public trust.
Unlike conventional conflicts, these strategies operate in what international security experts call the “gray zone”—a concept widely debated in global forums since 2023. In this model, destabilizing agents remain invisible while confusion proliferates. Technical glitches become “evidence” of governmental incompetence. Manipulated videos gain headline status. The constant repetition of false or misleading information generates social exhaustion, weakening collective trust in institutions.
The consequences are profound: simplified narratives gain acceptance while nuanced understanding of complex issues diminishes. Citizens become increasingly cynical about democratic processes and institutions.
In everyday life, seemingly simple rumors serve a strategic purpose. Disinformation about public policies and social programs spreads fear, insecurity, and distrust, even when quickly disproven. The damage remains because the goal isn’t complete persuasion but disruption of productive public debate. Over time, this ongoing conflict becomes normalized—a dangerous development for democratic stability.
Despite common perception, these offensives don’t depend solely on external agents. Their effectiveness requires internal collaboration. In Brazil, irresponsible influencers, automated profiles, business leaders with political interests, and opportunistic political actors amplify false narratives. Through this process, global geopolitical conflicts transform into domestic crises.
These domestic amplifiers don’t necessarily need direct orders from abroad. They simply need to share the same objective: weakening the state and eroding democratic norms and institutions.
Democratic institutions have become the primary targets of these campaigns. Brazil’s electoral system, Supreme Federal Court, professional journalism, universities, scientific community, and public policy apparatus all suffer systematic delegitimization efforts. These aren’t legitimate democratic criticisms but rather represent deliberate corrosion, according to institutional analyses released since 2016.
When all authority is portrayed as the enemy and every institutional decision as fraudulent, the groundwork is laid for authoritarian “solutions” to manufactured crises.
European countries have begun implementing coordinated responses between 2024 and 2025, launching investigations, holding platforms accountable, and advancing regulatory frameworks. Brazil, however, has been slower to react. A significant portion of society still downplays the problem, allowing disinformation structures to continue operating with relative impunity.
Addressing this challenge doesn’t mean censoring opinions. Rather, it requires confronting organized disinformation structures, strengthening professional journalism, implementing thoughtful regulation of digital platforms, and investing in critical media education.
Above all, it means reaffirming politics as a legitimate space for democratic debate—not as an arena for symbolic destruction of opposing viewpoints and institutions.
The information destabilization campaign is already well underway in Brazil. Treating this as normal means allowing the silent erosion of democratic foundations to continue unabated. Given these high stakes, every Brazilian faces an inevitable question: Which side of history do they choose to stand on?
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
The article underscores the crucial role of digital literacy and fact-checking initiatives in combating the spread of disinformation. As geopolitical tensions continue to evolve, strengthening the resilience of democratic institutions will be a paramount concern for Brazil and other nations.
Absolutely. Empowering citizens with the tools to critically evaluate online information is essential. Collaborative efforts between the government, tech sector, and civil society will be key to developing effective countermeasures.
This is a concerning development, as the erosion of public trust can have far-reaching consequences for Brazil’s democratic stability. I’m curious to learn more about the specific tactics and actors involved in these disinformation campaigns targeting the country.
The article highlights how modern conflicts often begin in the ‘gray zone’ of information warfare rather than traditional military action. Brazil’s experience illustrates the insidious nature of these tactics and the need for proactive, multi-faceted responses.
Absolutely. Disinformation campaigns exploit the vulnerabilities of open societies. Strengthening digital resilience, media literacy, and fact-based public discourse will be critical for Brazil and other democracies to safeguard their institutions.
This is a timely and sobering reminder of the vulnerabilities facing democracies in the digital age. The article highlights the need for Brazil to bolster its defenses against foreign disinformation campaigns that seek to sow political instability.
The article raises important questions about the evolving nature of geopolitical conflicts in the 21st century. The use of information manipulation to undermine democratic processes is a troubling trend that requires a comprehensive, multi-stakeholder response.
Agreed. Navigating this complex landscape of information warfare will require innovative approaches and close cooperation between governments, tech companies, civil society, and citizens. Building societal resilience is key.
This is a concerning trend, as disinformation campaigns can erode public trust and undermine the foundations of democracy. It’s crucial for Brazil to strengthen its resilience against such tactics through improved digital literacy and robust fact-checking initiatives.
I agree. Combating foreign interference in domestic politics is a major challenge facing many democracies today. Multilateral cooperation and information sharing will be key to developing effective countermeasures.