Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Indonesia, one of the world’s largest democracies and social media markets, faces a disinformation crisis of unparalleled scale—with authorities struggling to develop effective countermeasures against the growing threat.

The social unrest that erupted in August 2025 remains fresh in the national memory. What began as online misinformation quickly escalated into street-level chaos, with false and misleading content spreading rapidly across digital platforms. Public confusion transformed into heightened tensions within days, culminating in looting incidents across multiple regions of the archipelago.

This episode demonstrated the tangible consequences of information disorder in the digital age. Indonesia confronts this challenge with significant disadvantages: widespread gaps in media and digital literacy create fertile ground for deceptive content to flourish, while platform algorithms amplify divisive messages to an audience often ill-equipped to separate fact from fiction.

Though the need for action is evident, experts caution that effective responses require careful consideration rather than reactive policies. Evidence from other countries suggests that enforcement-focused approaches targeting individual pieces of content fail to address the underlying causes of information disorder.

“Disinformation operates within a complex ecosystem shaped by multiple factors,” said Dr. Siti Nurhaliza, a digital media researcher at Universitas Indonesia. “Platform business incentives, algorithmic amplification systems, cross-border information flows, and declining trust in traditional institutions all contribute to the problem. Any solution must address these systemic issues.”

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence has significantly worsened the situation. These technologies have dramatically reduced both the cost and time required to produce synthetic text, audio, images, and videos that appear authentic to average users. In such an environment, content removal approaches—often described as “playing whack-a-mole”—simply cannot keep pace with the volume of problematic material being created.

Regional frameworks are increasingly recognizing the need for systemic solutions. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) established guidelines in 2018 that prioritize media literacy development, institutional capacity building, and cross-sector cooperation over strict content control measures. These guidelines reflect growing recognition that sustainable solutions must address root causes rather than symptoms.

“What we’re seeing is a shift away from content-focused interventions toward ecosystem approaches,” explained Bambang Haryanto, coordinator of Indonesia’s Digital Literacy Coalition. “This means strengthening critical thinking skills, improving platform accountability, and rebuilding trust in information institutions.”

Indonesia’s large population—approximately 280 million people—combined with its high social media penetration rate makes it particularly vulnerable to information manipulation. The country has one of the world’s highest rates of social media usage, with platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook, and TikTok deeply integrated into daily communication.

Market analysts note that this massive digital audience represents both tremendous economic opportunity and significant risk. Technology companies view Indonesia as a critical growth market, while political actors—both domestic and foreign—recognize the population’s susceptibility to influence operations.

“Indonesia sits at a critical juncture,” said Maria Farida, executive director of Jakarta-based think tank Digital Democracy Institute. “The decisions made now about platform regulation, digital literacy investment, and institutional capacity will shape the information environment for generations.”

Experts emphasize that effective responses must balance competing concerns: preserving free expression while mitigating harm, respecting national sovereignty while acknowledging the global nature of digital platforms, and addressing immediate threats without compromising long-term resilience.

As Indonesia navigates these complex challenges, the stakes continue to rise. With national elections approaching and regional tensions increasing, the country’s ability to foster a healthier information ecosystem will have profound implications for social cohesion, democratic governance, and economic stability in the years ahead.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

9 Comments

  1. Patricia Thompson on

    Disinformation fueling real-world unrest is a worrying trend. Indonesia faces significant challenges, but thoughtful, evidence-based policymaking will be essential to address this complex issue.

    • Agreed. Reactive, heavy-handed policies could do more harm than good. A deliberative, inclusive approach is needed to uphold democratic principles while protecting public safety.

  2. Isabella Moore on

    Disinformation spreads quickly online, but heavy-handed crackdowns can backfire and undermine democratic principles. I hope Indonesia can find an effective middle ground to protect its citizens without stifling legitimate journalism.

    • The examples of other countries’ struggles with this issue will be important to study. Learning from both successes and failures elsewhere could help inform Indonesia’s approach.

  3. Oliver G. Rodriguez on

    I appreciate the nuanced perspective presented here. There are no easy answers, but carefully balancing security concerns with press freedom protections is vital. I hope Indonesia can find an effective path forward.

  4. William Thomas on

    The role of digital literacy in combating disinformation is an interesting angle. Empowering the public to critically evaluate online content seems key, alongside targeted enforcement against the worst offenders.

    • Michael Johnson on

      Absolutely. Investing in digital education will build societal resilience against manipulation in the long run, beyond just enforcement measures.

  5. This is a complex challenge with no easy solutions. Balancing security and press freedom requires nuance and care to avoid unintended consequences. I’m curious to hear more about the specific approaches being considered in Indonesia.

    • Robert Rodriguez on

      Agreed, there are valid concerns around government overreach in the name of security. Careful policy development with input from diverse stakeholders will be crucial.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.