Listen to the article
In a significant escalation of international pressure on Russia’s media apparatus, several high-profile Russian television personalities have been added to sanctions lists for their roles in disseminating state propaganda about the war in Ukraine.
The newly sanctioned individuals include some of Russia’s most recognizable media figures: Dmitry Guberniev, Ekaterina Andreeva, and Maria Sittel, along with propagandist Pavel Zarubin. According to official statements from the Council, these individuals have been directly involved in supporting Russian state propaganda channels and programs, most notably the highly choreographed “Direct Line with Vladimir Putin” broadcasts.
Guberniev, known primarily as a sports commentator before expanding his role in state media, has become increasingly vocal in his support of the Kremlin’s policies. Andreeva has been a fixture on Channel One for decades, serving as the composed, authoritative face of Russian state news during the evening broadcasts. Sittel similarly has built her career within the state media ecosystem, presenting news with a distinctly pro-Kremlin perspective.
Pavel Zarubin, perhaps less known internationally but highly influential domestically, has served as one of Putin’s personal interviewers and has been instrumental in crafting the carefully managed public image of the Russian president through controlled media appearances.
These sanctions represent a targeted approach against those deemed responsible for spreading disinformation about the war in Ukraine. Western officials have repeatedly accused Russian state media of fabricating narratives that misrepresent the nature and conduct of what the Kremlin continues to call a “special military operation” rather than a war or invasion.
The Council’s statement specifically cited these individuals’ roles in praising Vladimir Putin’s regime while simultaneously working to legitimize Russia’s military actions in Ukraine through distorted reporting and outright falsehoods.
This latest round of sanctions highlights the growing recognition among Western governments of the role media figures play in sustaining public support for the war within Russia. By targeting prominent presenters rather than just media executives or government officials, sanctions are beginning to reach those who directly communicate propaganda to the Russian public.
Media analysts note that these television personalities hold substantial influence in Russia, where television remains the primary source of news for a significant portion of the population, particularly among older generations. Unlike social media or internet news, which can be more diverse in viewpoint, Russian state television offers a tightly controlled narrative that aligns perfectly with Kremlin positions.
The sanctions will likely restrict these individuals’ ability to travel to countries that recognize the sanctions, freeze any assets they may hold abroad, and potentially limit their international business relationships. However, critics question whether such measures will meaningfully impact their domestic influence, as they primarily operate within Russia’s media ecosystem.
Russian authorities have typically responded to such sanctions by portraying targeted individuals as patriotic figures being persecuted by hostile Western powers. In many cases, being sanctioned has even boosted the domestic credibility of media figures among certain segments of the Russian population.
The Russian government has not yet issued an official response to these specific sanctions, though the Foreign Ministry has consistently condemned all sanctions against Russian citizens as illegitimate and counterproductive to diplomatic relations.
These measures come amid a broader pattern of increasing isolation of Russia’s media sphere from global information flows, with many Western media organizations withdrawing correspondents from Russia due to restrictive media laws that criminalize “false information” about the war, while numerous Western news sites and social media platforms have been blocked within Russia.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


28 Comments
Interesting update on EU Sanctions Six Individuals for Alleged Russian Disinformation Campaign. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Interesting update on EU Sanctions Six Individuals for Alleged Russian Disinformation Campaign. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Production mix shifting toward Disinformation might help margins if metals stay firm.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Interesting update on EU Sanctions Six Individuals for Alleged Russian Disinformation Campaign. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.