Listen to the article
Only a Comprehensive Approach Can Help Combat Disinformation
Fighting disinformation through legal sanctions alone presents significant challenges, according to recent research examining the effectiveness of regulatory measures against harmful information and manipulation. Experts now emphasize that a multifaceted strategy is essential for meaningful progress in this increasingly complex information landscape.
The study, which gathered insights from stakeholders across media, legal, and policy sectors, found that while punitive approaches can be part of the solution, they must be balanced with broader initiatives that include civil society participation and harmonization with European regulatory frameworks.
“Sanctions are just one piece of a much larger puzzle,” explains Dr. Aleksandra Temenugova, a media researcher involved in the study. “Without addressing the underlying causes and creating resilient information ecosystems, we’re simply treating symptoms rather than the disease.”
Foreign information manipulation and interference (FIMI), a particularly concerning subset of disinformation tactics, represents a growing threat to democratic institutions. These coordinated campaigns often originate beyond national borders, making them especially difficult to combat through traditional legal channels.
The research highlights how effective countermeasures require collaboration between government agencies, media organizations, tech platforms, and civil society groups. This “whole-of-society” approach enables more comprehensive detection, analysis, and response to disinformation campaigns.
European regulatory frameworks, including the Digital Services Act and the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation, provide important guidelines for member states and candidate countries. However, implementation at the national level remains challenging, particularly in regions where media literacy is lower and institutional capacity is limited.
“What works in one context may not translate directly to another,” notes legal expert Martin Petrovski. “Countries need to adapt European models to their specific media environments while maintaining alignment with EU standards.”
Media literacy emerges as a critical component in the fight against disinformation. Educational initiatives that help citizens critically evaluate information sources, understand manipulation techniques, and recognize propaganda are essential complements to regulatory approaches.
The research also addresses concerns about potential overreach in regulation. Overly restrictive measures risk infringing on freedom of expression and press freedom—fundamental rights that underpin democratic societies. Finding the balance between protecting citizens from harmful content while preserving these freedoms remains a delicate challenge for policymakers.
Technology companies bear significant responsibility in this ecosystem. Social media platforms, search engines, and content aggregators must improve their content moderation practices, increase transparency about algorithmic systems, and cooperate with independent fact-checkers to limit the spread of false information.
“Tech companies can’t simply wash their hands of responsibility,” says digital policy analyst Elena Mihajlovska. “Their algorithms and business models often amplify divisive content, creating financial incentives that reward misinformation.”
Several countries have pioneered different approaches to combating disinformation. The Finnish model emphasizes education and critical thinking from early schooling, while Taiwan has developed rapid response systems that quickly counter false narratives with factual information. These diverse strategies offer valuable lessons for crafting effective policies.
The research concludes that no single intervention will solve the disinformation challenge. Rather, success depends on coordinated efforts across multiple fronts: regulation that respects fundamental rights, platform accountability, media literacy initiatives, support for quality journalism, and international cooperation.
As disinformation techniques continue to evolve, so too must countermeasures. This requires ongoing research, regular evaluation of effectiveness, and the flexibility to adapt strategies as the information landscape changes.
“This isn’t a problem that will be solved once and for all,” concludes the research report. “It requires sustained commitment and continuous adaptation from all stakeholders in the information ecosystem.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


20 Comments
Coordinated foreign information manipulation and interference is a concerning threat to democratic institutions. Developing a comprehensive response seems crucial to safeguard against these challenges.
Absolutely, the cross-border nature of disinformation campaigns requires an aligned, multi-stakeholder approach. Harmonizing efforts internationally is key to building resilience.
Interesting to see experts emphasize the need for a broader initiative beyond just legal punitive measures. Disinformation is a challenging problem that requires a nuanced, coordinated response.
Absolutely, disinformation is a multi-faceted challenge that calls for a comprehensive solution involving various stakeholders. Regulatory frameworks alone may not be sufficient.
The study’s findings highlight the importance of addressing the underlying drivers of disinformation, not just the symptoms. A multifaceted strategy appears to be the way forward.
The experts make a valid point that legal sanctions alone are not enough to combat disinformation. A broader, more holistic strategy seems necessary to address this complex issue.
Treating the symptoms rather than the disease is a valid concern when it comes to combating disinformation. A multifaceted strategy targeting the root causes appears to be the way forward.
I agree, a piecemeal approach is unlikely to be effective in the long run. Addressing the underlying drivers of disinformation seems crucial for meaningful progress.
Combating disinformation requires a multifaceted approach, as legal sanctions alone are not enough. A comprehensive strategy involving civil society, policy harmonization, and addressing root causes seems crucial to build resilient information ecosystems.
I agree, a piecemeal approach won’t solve this complex issue. Tackling disinformation at its core through collaborative efforts seems the way forward.
The experts make a good point that legal sanctions alone are insufficient. Developing resilient information ecosystems through broader initiatives sounds like a wise investment for the future.
Disinformation is a complex, evolving challenge that requires a comprehensive response. The experts’ call for a nuanced strategy beyond just legal measures seems prudent.
I agree, a one-dimensional approach is unlikely to be sufficient. Addressing the root causes and building societal resilience should be the priority.
Combating disinformation requires a comprehensive strategy that goes beyond legal sanctions. The experts’ call for broader initiatives, including civil society participation and policy harmonization, seems well-justified.
The emphasis on civil society participation in the fight against disinformation is encouraging. Engaging a diverse range of stakeholders can lead to more sustainable and effective solutions.
Harmonizing regulatory frameworks at the European level could help strengthen the fight against disinformation. Coordinating efforts across borders and sectors seems essential.
Yes, aligning policies and approaches internationally can amplify the impact of anti-disinformation efforts. A collaborative, multi-stakeholder strategy appears to be the way forward.
The emphasis on addressing the root causes of disinformation, rather than just the symptoms, is an important perspective. A multifaceted approach targeting the underlying drivers appears to be the way forward.
I agree, treating the symptoms won’t solve the problem in the long run. Developing resilient information ecosystems through collaborative efforts is crucial.
The rise of foreign information manipulation and interference is indeed a growing threat to democratic institutions. A holistic approach to combat disinformation seems prudent to build societal resilience.