Listen to the article
In an age of viral misinformation, journalists face mounting pressure to maintain public trust while competing with the rapid spread of false narratives on social media platforms. This challenge was the focus of a recent RSA discussion featuring Eliot Higgins, founder of investigative outlet Bellingcat, and Carole Cadwalladr, veteran investigative journalist formerly with The Observer.
The media landscape has undergone a fundamental transformation from what Higgins described as an “elite, controlled, top-down information structure” of the early 20th century to today’s “peer-to-peer network” model. This shift has dramatically altered how information reaches the public.
“Content is content that is viral. It’s stuff that gets attention,” Higgins explained, noting that on platforms like X and YouTube, “people aren’t churning out content that’s truthful. They’re churning out content that gets engagement, because engagement equals money.”
Cadwalladr suggested that the combination of viral content alongside traditional media has left people “overwhelmed” and “bombarded with information,” potentially leading to what she characterized as “total information collapse.”
The social media environment favors certain information styles, according to Higgins. “Conspiratorial, populist, authoritarian styles of information work very well because they’re quick and they offer certainty, inclusion, and a sense of participation,” he said. Traditional journalism, with its methodical verification processes, often moves too slowly to compete effectively in this environment.
Bellingcat has responded to this challenge by creating content specifically designed for distribution across multiple platforms, with a particular focus on video. Their recent coverage of the Alex Pretti shooting in Minnesota demonstrated this approach, synchronizing multiple videos to present a comprehensive visual account that required no specialized knowledge for viewers to understand.
The discussion highlighted the growing gap between younger audiences and traditional news sources. Cadwalladr pointed to the unchanging format of news bulletins, noting that “people don’t trust them anymore.” Instead, younger audiences gravitate toward content creators “who are humanizing what’s happening and filtering it through their personalities and trying to make the news make sense.”
These content creators have established themselves as trusted voices, addressing the information needs of teenagers and young adults in ways that traditional news organizations have only belatedly begun to emulate, according to Cadwalladr.
Both speakers emphasized the critical importance of transparency and accountability in countering disinformation. Cadwalladr criticized many media institutions for being “distant and remote” and refusing to “answer to criticism.” Higgins suggested this stems from how news organizations conceptualize their audience relationship.
“I think the problem mainstream news organizations have is they struggle with what to do with their audience, because they still see them as customers or consumers, rather than participating in the news,” Higgins explained. “When you start saying ‘Oh, they’re participating,’ that becomes very scary for a traditional news organization.”
Bellingcat offers a potential model for audience engagement through its Discord community of approximately 40,000 members. This community recently collaborated to investigate an oil spill in Trinidad and Tobago that had been overlooked by international media and was beyond the resource capacity of local outlets. Several community members ultimately received bylines for their contributions to the published story.
“You need those avenues to actually draw that into something publishable,” Higgins said. “Plus, it means members are seeing our work and the transparency of our process as well.”
This collaborative approach represents a potential path forward for journalism in an era where traditional media must not only deliver accurate information but also rebuild trust with audiences increasingly skeptical of institutional sources. By embracing transparency and meaningful audience participation, news organizations may find new ways to counter disinformation while remaining relevant in a rapidly evolving media landscape.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
The challenges outlined in this article are deeply concerning, particularly for industries like mining that can be susceptible to misinformation and sensationalism. I’m hopeful that innovative solutions and cross-sector collaboration can help address this problem and restore public trust in factual, reliable information.
Well said. Maintaining accurate, objective reporting on mining, commodities, and energy will be crucial in the years ahead. Industry leaders, policymakers, and media professionals must work together to combat the spread of disinformation and ensure informed, balanced public discourse.
The shift towards peer-to-peer information networks is certainly a double-edged sword. While it democratizes access to content, it also creates challenges around verifying the accuracy and reliability of that information. This is an issue the mining sector needs to grapple with.
Well said. As an investor in mining and energy companies, I’m concerned about the potential impact of unchecked misinformation on market perceptions and decision-making. Robust fact-checking and transparency will be crucial.
This is a complex problem without any easy solutions. The media landscape has undoubtedly changed, but the need for rigorous, objective reporting remains. I’m curious to hear more about potential industry-led initiatives to combat misinformation in mining and commodities.
That’s an interesting point. Industry collaboration and self-regulation could be an effective approach, complementing the efforts of journalists and media outlets. A multi-stakeholder effort may be required to address this challenge effectively.
This discussion highlights the critical need for media literacy and critical thinking skills in the digital age. As consumers of information, we all have a responsibility to verify sources, check for bias, and seek out balanced, fact-based reporting, especially when it comes to complex topics like mining and energy.
Absolutely. Developing media literacy and encouraging a more discerning, skeptical approach to online content are essential to combating the spread of misinformation. This is an issue that affects us all, regardless of our industry or background.
Interesting perspective on the challenges of combating misinformation in the digital age. As someone involved in the mining and commodities industry, I’m curious to hear more about how this issue impacts our sector and what solutions could be effective.
You raise a good point. Disinformation can certainly have an impact on commodity markets and mining equities, so addressing it is critical. I’d be interested to learn more about potential industry-specific approaches to tackling this problem.
This is a timely and important discussion. Misinformation can spread like wildfire online, and it’s vital that journalists and media outlets work to maintain public trust and accuracy, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like mining and energy.
I agree. Fact-based, ethical journalism is essential to counter the proliferation of false narratives, particularly in niche industries where technical details can be easily misrepresented.
As someone with a background in the mining industry, I’m concerned about the potential for misinformation to distort public perceptions and influence policy decisions. Transparency and fact-based reporting are essential to maintain public trust and support for responsible resource development.
I agree wholeheartedly. The mining industry has faced its share of challenges when it comes to public perception, and combating misinformation should be a top priority to ensure a balanced, informed dialogue on the role of minerals and metals in the modern economy.
As someone with a keen interest in the mining and metals sectors, I’m alarmed by the potential for misinformation to distort market perceptions and undermine public confidence. Rigorous fact-checking, transparency, and media literacy initiatives will be essential to address this challenge effectively.
I agree completely. The mining industry has faced its share of reputational challenges, and combating the spread of false narratives online should be a top priority. A concerted, multi-stakeholder approach is needed to restore trust and ensure accurate, balanced reporting on these critical sectors.