Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Senate Committee Calls for Action Against Climate Change Disinformation

Australia’s democratic institutions face a growing threat from coordinated disinformation campaigns aimed at preventing climate action and maintaining fossil fuel dependence, according to a landmark Senate report released last week.

The Senate select committee on information integrity on climate change and energy has sounded the alarm about Australia’s deteriorating “digital town square” and the erosion of public trust. The final report, backed by Labor, Liberal, and Greens senators, made 21 recommendations to safeguard Australia’s information ecosystem.

“A robust information ecosystem is critical to the health of Australia’s democracy and to its ability to meet the challenges arising from climate change — including the need to transition to renewable energy sources,” the report stated. It highlighted Australia’s particularly high levels of concern about information integrity compared to other nations.

The committee spent months investigating how climate and energy misinformation is financed, produced, and disseminated, along with connections between Australian organizations and foreign influence networks. Their findings revealed significant concerns about “dark money” fueling climate misinformation campaigns in Australia.

One key issue identified was the lack of transparency surrounding donations to think tanks and third-party organizations. The committee also noted the growing use of “astroturfing” – highly coordinated and well-financed campaigns disguised as grassroots movements, often linked to think tanks, corporate interests, lobby groups, or political parties.

The recommendations focus heavily on improving transparency and accountability. The report suggests the federal government explore ways to enhance transparency around political campaign activities resourced by commercial interests and consider funding models for independent monitoring of hidden digital influence ecosystems.

Other key recommendations include continued funding support for regional and independent media outlets, proper funding for corporate regulators to combat “greenwashing,” and increased emphasis on media, digital, and science literacy education. The committee also recommended Australia officially endorse the Declaration on Information Integrity in Climate Change launched at COP30 and adopt the UN Global Principles for Information Integrity.

Committee chair, Greens senator Peter Whish-Wilson, described the inquiry as the first of its kind in Australia, designed to raise awareness and start a national conversation about transparency and accountability around false information undermining climate action.

“Evidence was provided that a ‘denial machine’ has deliberately obstructed climate and energy policy for decades in Australia,” Whish-Wilson said. “This ‘denial machine’ has included conservative think tanks, law firms, PR firms, consultancies, third-party campaign groups and some conservative media outlets.”

Despite broad cross-party agreement, Nationals leader Matt Canavan issued a dissenting report, claiming the inquiry sought to “suppress, ridicule and silence anyone who expresses different views from the current scientific consensus.”

Former defense leaders have gone even further in their warnings about disinformation. Retired Admiral Chris Barrie, former chief of the Australian Defence Force and a member of the Australian Security Leaders Climate Group (ASLCG), described the situation as a “disinformation war” that threatens national security, sovereignty, economic resilience, and institutional trust.

“We are facing an unprecedented energy crisis [made] worse by the world’s failure to face its fossil fuel addiction,” Admiral Barrie warned. “Layered on top is a climate disinformation war globally and in Australia that is actively undermining the capacity to build a renewable, clean energy future and curb coal and gas exports.”

The ASLCG’s separate report highlighted additional concerns, including the Trump administration’s destruction of climate and clean-tech data and research in the United States. Recent controversies include plans to dismantle the National Center for Atmospheric Research, budget cuts at NASA, and job cuts at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The ASLCG has called for Australia to strengthen its climate science capabilities and potentially fill the global leadership vacuum by establishing an Australian Institute for Earth System Science.

As the battle against climate disinformation continues, it’s clear that these recommendations represent just the beginning of efforts to restore integrity to Australia’s information ecosystem and enable meaningful climate action.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

10 Comments

  1. This report highlights the urgent need to address climate change misinformation and protect our democratic institutions. Maintaining public trust in reliable information is critical as we transition to renewable energy sources.

    • Agreed, it’s concerning to see the erosion of trust in climate science and growing influence of disinformation campaigns. Robust action is needed to safeguard our information ecosystem.

  2. Elizabeth Thompson on

    This report underscores the global nature of the challenge posed by coordinated disinformation campaigns. International cooperation and shared learning will be essential to developing effective countermeasures.

    • Isabella Smith on

      Absolutely. Misinformation knows no borders, so a collaborative approach across nations will be key to safeguarding democratic institutions worldwide.

  3. Isabella Lopez on

    As an investor in mining and energy equities, I’m curious to see how this report’s recommendations could impact the policy landscape and business environment for fossil fuel companies versus renewable energy firms.

    • James Thompson on

      Good point. Any regulatory or enforcement measures targeting climate misinformation could create both risks and opportunities for different sectors of the energy and mining markets.

  4. Patricia X. Garcia on

    While I’m sympathetic to concerns about misinformation, I wonder if some of the report’s recommendations could inadvertently restrict legitimate debate and free expression on these issues. We need to balance addressing disinformation with preserving democratic freedoms.

    • James Garcia on

      That’s a fair concern. Any proposed solutions will need to be carefully designed to target bad actors while protecting free speech rights. Finding the right balance will be critical.

  5. Patricia Thompson on

    As an Australian citizen, I’m glad to see our government taking this threat to our democracy seriously. Strengthening the integrity of our information ecosystem should be a top priority.

  6. James Taylor on

    This is an important issue that goes beyond just climate change. Maintaining the integrity of public discourse and democratic decision-making is crucial across a range of complex policy challenges.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.