Listen to the article
Post-Truth Politics: How Fake News and Disinformation Shape European Democracy
The resurgence of anti-democratic movements, widespread conspiracy theories, and the decline of traditional media have prompted scholars and political observers to examine the evolving role of truth in modern politics. The term “post-truth” saw its usage rise by more than 2,000 percent in 2015, earning it Oxford Dictionaries’ word of the year in 2016.
Against this backdrop, a comprehensive research initiative has examined the impact of fake news, disinformation, and post-truth politics on the European Union in comparative context. The research focused on three key areas: the role of emotion and narrative in political discourse, the influence of populist political actors, and the power of media in contemporary contentious politics.
Social movement outcomes have traditionally depended on institutional structures and the ideologies of those in power. Recent examples like the Occupy Movement and anti-austerity protests across Europe demonstrated the challenges facing progressive contentious politics, while nationalist and Eurosceptic movements gained surprising traction.
Though European integration enjoyed widespread optimism in the late 20th century, Euroscepticism has risen dramatically since the 2008 financial crisis. Growing inequality and the mainstreaming of far-right and far-left politics have further complicated the European political landscape, according to researchers Hallgrimsdottir, Leconte, and others who have tracked these trends.
Media plays a central role in these dynamics. Researchers Alcántara-Lizárraga and Jima-González investigated the effects of government misinformation on social media, finding that while such tactics might temporarily quell unrest, they ultimately damage public trust and lead to greater mobilization against the state in the long term.
Orlando and Conrad’s work examined how structural factors influenced support for Brexit, showing that these factors only gain political meaning when communicated through emotionally and culturally resonant narratives. Their research highlighted how political actors deliberately craft narratives—such as blaming NHS funding shortages on the EU—to advance their agendas.
In related work, Beaupre analyzed newspaper coverage of the European migrant crisis, emphasizing how media relied on emotional tone as much as factual content to shape public perception. This research underscores the growing primacy of emotion over objective truth in political discourse.
LeVan’s contribution addressed the subjectivity inherent in post-truth politics and declining satisfaction with democratic institutions across Western societies. He noted disillusionment with liberalism on both ends of the political spectrum and examined how populist movements pursue national homogeneity through exclusionary tactics. LeVan proposed “pluralistic solidarity” as a potential solution—an expanded form of multiculturalism that recognizes how individual rights connect to cultural identities.
The research highlights the contradictions in current European politics. Despite unprecedented gains by Eurosceptic and far-right parties across Europe, opinion polls show that 52% of Europeans maintain a positive view of the EU, with 73% believing the EU has benefited their country. These contradictions reflect the deep polarization affecting Western democracies in the post-truth era.
This work forms part of a larger research agenda supported by a Jean Monnet Network Grant based at Iceland’s Höfði Reykjavík Peace Centre, with connections to the University of Victoria’s Centre for Global Studies. The research emerged in response to Iceland’s post-2008 political restructuring around European integration narratives and has expanded to examine crisis-driven contentious politics more broadly.
Through these studies, researchers aim to understand both the extent and impact of disinformation and fake news across digital and traditional media, as well as through conventional mobilization mechanisms, and how these factors influence public perception of European integration legitimacy.
In a political environment where truth appears increasingly subjective and contested, this research contributes vital insights into how democratic societies might navigate the challenges of post-truth politics while maintaining social cohesion and democratic values.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
Analyzing the role of emotion and narrative in political discourse is a really intriguing angle. It speaks to the way in which populist movements have been able to tap into people’s fears and anxieties, often through the use of oversimplified messaging and scapegoating. I’m keen to learn more about how this dynamic has unfolded in the EU.
Absolutely. The power of emotion and compelling narratives to sway public opinion is well-documented. It will be fascinating to see how the researchers unpack this phenomenon and the implications for European democracy.
The decline of traditional media and the rise of social media echo chambers is a critical factor in the spread of disinformation. I wonder how the researchers are addressing the role of tech platforms and the challenges of regulating online content in a way that balances free speech and democratic values.
That’s a great point. The interplay between media, technology, and politics is a complex and evolving landscape. I’m curious to see how the researchers approach these issues and any policy recommendations they might offer.
The rise of post-truth politics and the impact of fake news is a global phenomenon, but it’s fascinating to see how it has played out in the European context. I wonder how the findings of this research might compare to the situation in other parts of the world, like the US or Asia.
Good point. Understanding the regional nuances and how disinformation tactics may differ across cultures and political systems will be key. I’m curious to see if there are any common threads or unique challenges faced by European democracies.
It’s fascinating to see how the EU and other Western democracies are grappling with these challenges. I’m particularly interested in the comparative aspect – how have different countries and political systems responded, and what can we learn from their experiences?
Absolutely. A comparative approach is crucial here, as different countries and regions may face unique obstacles and utilize different strategies. I’m eager to see what insights the researchers are able to uncover through this lens.
Interesting to see how the rise of fake news and post-truth politics has impacted Western democracies, including the EU. It’s a complex issue with many factors at play, from the spread of disinformation to the decline of traditional media. Looking forward to reading more about the findings of this research initiative.
Agreed, the interplay between emotion, narrative, populism, and media is crucial to understanding the current landscape. I’m curious to see how the researchers approach these themes in a comparative context across Europe.
The rise of nationalist and Eurosceptic movements is a concerning trend that warrants close examination. I wonder how the researchers are assessing the factors that have contributed to the appeal of these ideologies, and what implications this might have for the future of European integration.
That’s a great question. The strength of anti-democratic and Eurosceptic movements is a worrying development that needs to be understood in depth. I’m curious to see how the researchers analyze the drivers behind this and the potential consequences for European unity and stability.
This is a timely and important topic. The erosion of trust in institutions and the proliferation of conspiracy theories is a worrying trend that threatens the foundations of democracy. I hope this research provides some insights into how to combat the spread of disinformation and restore faith in the political process.
Absolutely. Restoring trust and truth in the public sphere is critical. I’m interested to see how the EU and other Western democracies have responded to these challenges, and what lessons can be drawn for the future.
This research initiative sounds like a timely and important contribution to our understanding of the complex challenges facing Western democracies. I’m particularly interested in the findings on the role of emotion and narrative, as well as the influence of populist actors. This is a critical issue that deserves close attention.
Agreed. The interplay of emotion, narrative, and populism is a key dynamic that has reshaped the political landscape. I’m eager to see how the researchers unpack these themes and provide insights that can help strengthen democratic institutions and processes.