Listen to the article
Federal Judge Allows New York Offshore Wind Project to Resume Construction
A federal judge ruled Monday that Sunrise Wind, a major offshore wind project designed to power 600,000 New York homes, can resume construction after being halted by the Trump administration in December. This marks the fifth such project cleared to proceed after the administration’s controversial freeze on East Coast wind developments.
Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia found that the government failed to demonstrate that offshore wind poses an imminent national security risk warranting the construction halt. The ruling follows similar decisions earlier this year that allowed construction to resume on other major wind projects including Revolution Wind, Empire Wind, Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, and Vineyard Wind.
Danish energy company Orsted, which sued the administration over the pause affecting both its Sunrise Wind and Revolution Wind projects, announced it would resume work as soon as possible. The Sunrise Wind project is approximately 45% complete and expected to be operational next year, with the capacity to generate 924 megawatts of electricity.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management declined to comment on the litigation, and it remains unclear whether the administration will appeal the decision.
The Trump administration’s December freeze on offshore wind developments came amid President Donald Trump’s repeated criticisms of wind energy, which he has called “the scam of the century.” White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers has maintained throughout the legal battle that the pause was intended to protect national security.
However, industry advocates and state officials have pushed back against these claims. Hillary Bright, executive director of offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward, emphasized the critical importance of these projects amid rising electricity demand and grid reliability concerns.
“These projects represent critically needed utility-scale power sources that are making progress toward completion,” Bright said. She estimated that the five projects now cleared to proceed would collectively generate 6 gigawatts of electricity, enough to power 2.5 million American homes and businesses.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul called Monday’s ruling a “big win” for the state’s future, asserting that “energy independence is national security.” New York Attorney General Letitia James had sued the Trump administration over halting Sunrise Wind and Empire Wind, arguing the pause threatened the state’s economy and energy grid.
Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, the top Democrat on the Senate environment committee, criticized the administration’s “irrational and unpredictable” attempts to stifle the offshore wind industry as harmful to the broader economy.
The construction delays have inflicted significant financial damage. Court documents filed by Sunrise Wind LLC revealed that the stop-work order was costing the project at least $1.25 million per day, with potential project cancellation looming if construction couldn’t resume by early February.
Industry experts note that beyond the immediate financial impacts to developers, the administration’s actions have injected uncertainty into the renewable energy sector and potentially raised costs for electricity consumers. The delays come at a critical time when the United States is working to expand clean energy capacity and reduce carbon emissions.
While Trump has criticized offshore wind turbines as visually unappealing, Orsted maintains that Sunrise Wind’s turbines will be located at least 30 miles east of Long Island’s Montauk Point, making them virtually unnoticeable from shore.
With all five major East Coast offshore wind projects now cleared to resume work, developers are racing to make up for lost time while navigating the continued policy uncertainty surrounding renewable energy development in the United States.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
This decision represents a setback for the Trump administration’s efforts to block offshore wind development. It’s encouraging to see the courts reject claims of national security risks that were used to justify halting these projects.
You’re right, the administration’s arguments against offshore wind didn’t seem to hold up under scrutiny. These rulings demonstrate the importance of independent judicial review to ensure projects can proceed based on the merits.
Interesting development in the offshore wind energy space. It’s good to see the courts upholding the continued progress of these major clean energy projects, even in the face of political opposition. Renewable power is crucial for a sustainable future.
Indeed, this ruling is an important victory for the offshore wind industry. Clearing the way for projects like Sunrise Wind to move forward is a positive step in advancing renewable energy infrastructure.
Offshore wind power is an important part of the energy transition, so it’s good to see the courts affirming that these projects can move forward. With more renewable capacity coming online, it will be fascinating to see how this impacts the broader energy market.
Absolutely, the growth of offshore wind will be a key factor in shaping the future energy landscape. As these large-scale projects become operational, it will be worth monitoring their performance and integration into the grid.
This is an important victory for the offshore wind industry and for the broader transition to clean energy. It’s encouraging to see the courts upholding the continued development of these major renewable power projects, despite political opposition.
I agree, this ruling is a significant milestone. Overcoming legal challenges is crucial for the offshore wind sector to expand and contribute to a more sustainable energy future.
The ability of these offshore wind projects to resume construction is a win for clean energy and the environment. It will be interesting to see if the administration appeals the latest ruling or if they accept the court’s decision.
Given the previous rulings going against them, the administration may have a difficult time overturning this latest decision. Renewable energy developers will be eager to make progress on these critical infrastructure projects.
The Trump administration’s efforts to block offshore wind development have now been rejected in multiple court cases. This suggests the legal arguments against these projects may be on shaky ground. It will be interesting to see if the administration changes course or continues to pursue appeals.
You raise a good point. The repeated legal setbacks could prompt the administration to reconsider its stance, especially if the courts continue to rule in favor of allowing these renewable energy projects to move forward.