Listen to the article
Supreme Court Deals Blow to Trump’s Tariff Authority in Landmark Ruling
In a stunning rebuke to President Donald Trump’s trade agenda, the Supreme Court on Friday struck down his expansive use of tariffs, dealing a significant setback to a cornerstone of his economic policy. The 6-3 ruling invalidates approximately $175 billion in import taxes and raises urgent questions about the administration’s path forward on international trade.
The president responded defiantly to the decision, describing it as “deeply disappointing” and “ridiculous.” In unusually harsh criticism of the high court, Trump said he was “absolutely ashamed” of the six justices who ruled against him “for not having the courage to do what’s right for our country,” calling them “fools and lapdogs” who are “very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution.”
Trump learned of the ruling during a private meeting with governors when an aide handed him a note. According to sources familiar with the exchange who spoke on condition of anonymity, the president immediately called the decision “a disgrace” and suggested he needed “to do something about these courts.”
Despite the setback, Trump quickly outlined plans to circumvent the ruling. He announced intentions to sign an executive order imposing a 10% tax on global imports while initiating national security investigations to target specific products with additional tariffs. When questioned about the 150-day legal limit on such measures, Trump dismissed concerns, claiming, “we have a right to do pretty much what we want to do.”
This legal battle unfolds against a backdrop of growing voter discontent with the tariff policies. Recent polling indicates 76% of Americans believe the tariffs increase consumer costs, while approximately 60% think Trump has gone too far in imposing new trade barriers. This public sentiment poses significant political challenges heading into the midterm elections.
Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy has represented a dramatic shift in Republican economic orthodoxy, transforming a party that once championed free trade into one that frequently embraces protectionism. This evolution has created tension within GOP ranks, with several prominent Republicans publicly breaking with the president on trade policy.
Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell praised the Supreme Court’s decision, calling Trump’s attempt to bypass Congress “illegal” and emphasizing that “Congress’ role in trade policy, as I have warned repeatedly, is not an inconvenience to avoid.” Former Vice President Mike Pence also welcomed the ruling, noting that “American families and American businesses pay American tariffs — not foreign countries.”
Democrats seized on the ruling as evidence of executive overreach. Representative Suzan DelBene of Washington, who chairs the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, declared that Trump “is not a king” and that his “tariffs were always illegal,” criticizing Republicans in Congress for failing to “stand up for their communities” while “families, small businesses and farmers suffered from higher prices.”
The timing of the ruling is particularly significant as it came just one day after Trump vigorously defended his tariff policies during a campaign stop in Georgia. Speaking at Coosa Steel, a company that credited the import taxes with making its products more competitive against Chinese goods, Trump mentioned “tariff” 28 times and insisted, “Without tariffs, this country would be in such trouble right now.”
The court’s decision creates substantial uncertainty for businesses and consumers alike. Questions remain about whether the approximately $175 billion in tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court will be refunded, and how the administration’s promised alternative measures might impact global trade relationships and domestic prices.
As the midterm elections approach, the ruling has effectively ensured that trade policy will remain a central and contentious issue in American politics, with Trump’s response to this judicial constraint potentially reshaping both his economic agenda and his relationship with the other branches of government.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
6 Comments
This decision underscores the ongoing tensions between the administration’s protectionist trade agenda and the constitutional limits on presidential power. It will be a pivotal moment in shaping the future of US trade policy.
Curious to see how this ruling impacts the mining, metals, and energy sectors that have been affected by the tariffs. Will it lead to changes in supply chains and investment decisions?
This decision is a significant blow to Trump’s trade agenda, which has relied heavily on the use of tariffs. It will be interesting to see how the administration responds and what impact this has on future trade policy.
While the president has touted tariffs as a key part of his economic policy, this ruling suggests the courts are willing to place limits on that authority. It raises important questions about the balance of power on trade matters.
The Supreme Court’s ruling is a strong rebuke of the president’s expansive use of tariffs. It remains to be seen how this will shape future trade negotiations and the administration’s approach to international commerce.
Given the president’s strong criticism of the justices, I wonder if this will further strain relations between the executive and judicial branches.