Listen to the article
President Donald Trump has nominated government economist Brett Matsumoto to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), following months of tension between the administration and the agency responsible for key economic data.
The announcement comes after Trump previously accused the BLS of manipulating jobs numbers to undermine his presidency, claims for which no evidence has been presented. In a Friday night post on Truth Social, Trump described the agency as troubled and previously led by “WEAK and STUPID people,” while expressing confidence that Matsumoto would “quickly fix” the agency’s alleged issues.
“Brett Matsumoto is a Brilliant, Reputable, and Trusted Economist who will restore GREATNESS to the Bureau of Labor Statistics,” Trump wrote in his social media announcement.
Matsumoto brings significant experience to the role, having served as a supervisory research economist at the BLS before moving to his current position as a senior economist for the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
This nomination follows a period of turbulence for the agency. In August, Trump fired then-BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer shortly after the release of July’s jobs report, which showed only 73,000 jobs added that month—a figure later revised downward to 72,000. The report also included significant downward revisions to previous months, indicating the job market had weakened more than initially reported after Trump’s return to the White House.
The BLS plays a crucial role in economic policymaking, producing not only monthly employment statistics but also critical inflation data through the Consumer Price Index. These metrics are closely watched by financial markets, the Federal Reserve, and policymakers as key indicators of economic health.
Trump’s first choice to lead the agency, E.J. Antoni, chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, saw his nomination withdrawn in September amid questions about his qualifications. NBC News also reported Antoni’s presence outside the U.S. Capitol during the January 6, 2021, insurrection, further complicating his candidacy.
The president’s public criticism of the BLS represents an unusual breach in the traditional firewall between the White House and statistical agencies that are designed to operate independently of political pressure. Economic data agencies like the BLS have historically maintained strict protocols to ensure their findings are free from political influence.
Labor economists have expressed concern about the potential politicization of economic data, noting that maintaining the BLS’s reputation for impartial analysis is crucial for market confidence and sound policymaking.
The Wall Street Journal first reported Matsumoto’s selection, which comes as the administration prepares for a second term focused heavily on economic policy. The nomination will require Senate confirmation, a process that could face scrutiny given the president’s public statements about the agency.
The tensions between Trump and the BLS highlight broader debates about economic measurement in a polarized political environment. Statistical agencies like the BLS rely on methodologies developed over decades to produce accurate measures of complex economic phenomena, but their findings have increasingly become politicized as economic outcomes are tied more directly to presidential performance metrics.
Market analysts will be watching closely to see whether Matsumoto maintains the agency’s traditional independence or implements changes to its methodologies for collecting and reporting economic data.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
As a long-time BLS economist, Matsumoto seems well-qualified for this position. However, the recent turbulence at the agency is concerning. I hope he can quickly stabilize operations and reassure stakeholders about the BLS’s independence.
Absolutely. With the political tensions, it will be essential for Matsumoto to demonstrate the BLS’s commitment to factual, unbiased data. Restoring trust should be a top priority.
The nomination of Matsumoto is an interesting development. Given the previous accusations against the BLS, I’m curious to see how he plans to address those issues and rebuild confidence in the agency’s work.
The choice of Matsumoto is an interesting one, given his background at the BLS. It will be important for him to demonstrate a commitment to the agency’s nonpartisan mission, even in the face of political pressure.
Absolutely. The BLS must remain a neutral arbiter of economic statistics, regardless of who is in the White House. Matsumoto’s leadership will be crucial in navigating these waters.
This nomination raises some important questions about the future direction of the BLS. I’ll be watching closely to see how Matsumoto addresses the agency’s challenges and works to restore its standing as a trusted source of economic data.
Interesting to see the administration make this high-profile nomination to the BLS. Matsumoto seems like a solid choice with relevant experience at the agency. It will be important for him to maintain the BLS’s independence and credibility, regardless of any past tensions with the White House.
Agreed. The BLS needs to remain a nonpartisan source of economic data. Hopefully this nomination can help move past the previous accusations and restore trust in the agency’s work.
The BLS plays a critical role in providing objective, reliable data to policymakers and the public. While I’m curious to see Matsumoto’s approach, the key will be upholding the agency’s reputation for impartiality, even in the face of political pressure.
This nomination is a test for the BLS and its ability to maintain its credibility. Matsumoto’s experience could be an asset, but he’ll need to show a clear dedication to the agency’s independence and impartiality.
Matsumoto’s experience at the BLS could be an asset, but the agency’s credibility has clearly taken a hit. I hope he can effectively navigate the political landscape and reaffirm the BLS’s role as an impartial, data-driven institution.
Agreed. Maintaining the BLS’s independence and reputation for objectivity will be critical, especially given the recent tensions with the White House.