Listen to the article
U.S. Border Patrol operates a covert nationwide surveillance program monitoring millions of American drivers, according to an investigation by The Associated Press. This extensive monitoring system uses algorithms to flag vehicles based on travel patterns deemed suspicious, often leading to traffic stops, searches, and occasionally arrests.
The program, which began approximately ten years ago to combat illegal border activities and trafficking, has expanded significantly over the past five years. It now extends well beyond the traditional 100-mile border zone where Border Patrol typically operates, reaching deep into the American interior.
The surveillance network relies on a sophisticated system of cameras that scan and record license plate information. These devices are strategically positioned along highways, often disguised within traffic safety equipment like barrels and drums to avoid detection. The program’s algorithm identifies vehicles based on origin points, destinations, and chosen routes, flagging those that match patterns the agency associates with suspicious activity.
When a vehicle is flagged, Border Patrol agents may alert local law enforcement, who then find reasons to pull over drivers – often citing minor infractions like speeding, failure to signal, or obstructed views from hanging air fresheners. During these stops, drivers face intensive questioning and searches without ever being informed that their travel patterns triggered the encounter.
The AP investigation, based on interviews with eight former government officials with direct knowledge of the program, thousands of court documents, government records, and arrest reports, marks the first detailed revelation of how this surveillance system operates across American roadways.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the parent agency of Border Patrol, defended the program, stating they use license plate readers to identify threats and disrupt criminal networks. The agency claims the technology operates within a “stringent, multi-layered policy framework” and follows federal law and constitutional protections. They declined to provide specific operational details, citing national security concerns.
The agency also emphasized that while Border Patrol primarily operates within 100 miles of national borders, it has legal authority to operate anywhere in the United States.
Over time, the program has established its own criteria for defining suspicious behavior, targeting drivers for activities such as traveling on back roads, using rental cars, or making short trips to border regions. The surveillance network has expanded along both the southern border in Texas, Arizona, and California, and the northern border with Canada.
Border Patrol has significantly increased its surveillance capabilities through partnerships with other agencies. The network now incorporates data from license plate readers operated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, private companies, and local law enforcement programs funded through federal grants. Documents show that Texas law enforcement agencies have requested Border Patrol to use facial recognition technology to identify drivers.
This expansion reflects a broader transformation of Customs and Border Protection into something resembling a domestic intelligence operation. The Trump administration’s focus on enhanced immigration enforcement positioned CBP to receive more than $2.7 billion to further develop border surveillance systems, including the license plate reader program, with plans to incorporate artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies.
Legal experts have raised concerns about the constitutional implications of such extensive surveillance. Andrew Ferguson, a law professor at George Washington University, noted that courts have begun to recognize that “large-scale surveillance technology that’s capturing everyone and everywhere at every time” might violate Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Nicole Ozer, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Democracy at UC Law San Francisco, expressed alarm at the AP’s findings, stating, “They are collecting mass amounts of information about who people are, where they go, what they do, and who they know. These surveillance systems do not make communities safer.”
The Border Patrol has reportedly attempted to keep details of this program secret, with sources indicating efforts to exclude mentions of the license plate reader system from court documents and police reports.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
This is a complex issue with valid security concerns, but the lack of transparency and broad scope of this surveillance system is very troubling. Monitoring drivers’ travel patterns across the entire country seems like an overreach, even with the goal of combating illegal activities. More public input and clearly defined limits are needed.
I agree, the expansive nature of this program and the opaque algorithms used to flag ‘suspicious’ travel warrant serious scrutiny. The public deserves to know more about the specific criteria and safeguards in place to protect civil liberties.
While the Border Patrol’s intentions to combat illegal activities are understandable, the broad surveillance network and use of algorithms to monitor drivers’ movements is concerning. There needs to be much more transparency, oversight, and clear guidelines around the program’s scope and methods to ensure it doesn’t infringe on the rights of ordinary citizens.
I’m not surprised to see the Border Patrol’s surveillance capabilities have grown so much over the years. However, the broad geographic reach and use of algorithms to flag ‘suspicious’ travel is worrying. There needs to be much more public oversight and debate around the boundaries and safeguards for this type of program.
Wow, this is a surprisingly extensive surveillance system run by the Border Patrol. I can see the value in monitoring for trafficking and other illicit cross-border activities, but the broad geographic scope and use of algorithmic profiling raises serious civil liberties concerns. This merits deeper public debate and oversight.
Hmm, this program does sound quite expansive and invasive. I can understand the need to monitor for illegal border activities, but the broad reach and use of algorithms to flag ‘suspicious’ travel patterns seems problematic. More transparency and safeguards are definitely needed here.
It’s alarming to see how far the Border Patrol’s surveillance has expanded beyond the border region. Monitoring drivers’ travel patterns across the entire country seems like an overreach, even if the intent is to combat trafficking. More public scrutiny and debate around the program’s scope and methods is needed.
I agree, the lack of transparency around the algorithms used to flag ‘suspicious’ travel is very worrying. There needs to be more accountability and clear guidelines to prevent abuse of this system.
This surveillance program by the Border Patrol raises some concerning civil liberties issues. While monitoring for illegal activities is important, the broad reach and lack of transparency around the algorithms used is troubling. We need more oversight and safeguards to ensure this system doesn’t infringe on innocent citizens’ rights.
This is an interesting report, but I have some concerns about the privacy implications of such a broad surveillance network. While border security is important, I’m not sure the benefits outweigh the risks of such pervasive monitoring of American citizens’ movements. More oversight and public input is needed.
This is a concerning development. While border security is important, the Border Patrol’s expanded surveillance system seems to go too far in monitoring the travel patterns of ordinary American citizens. More transparency and accountability around the program’s methods and safeguards is needed.