Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Saudi Arabia May Gain Uranium Enrichment Capability Under Proposed U.S. Deal

Saudi Arabia could acquire uranium enrichment capabilities through a proposed nuclear agreement with the United States, according to congressional documents and analysis from arms control experts. The potential deal raises significant proliferation concerns amid ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Iran over nuclear development in the region.

Both the Trump and Biden administrations have pursued nuclear cooperation agreements with Saudi Arabia to share American technology, potentially worth billions of dollars. The proposed arrangement would include safeguards with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), but nonproliferation experts warn that even limited enrichment capability could open the door to a possible weapons program.

“Nuclear cooperation can be a positive mechanism for upholding nonproliferation norms and increasing transparency, but the devil is in the details,” wrote Kelsey Davenport, director for nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control Association in Washington.

The timing of these discussions is particularly sensitive given the current geopolitical landscape. Saudi Arabia and nuclear-armed Pakistan signed a mutual defense pact last year following Israeli military operations against Hamas in Qatar. Pakistan’s defense minister made the notable statement that his country’s nuclear program “will be made available” to Saudi Arabia if needed – widely interpreted as a warning to Israel, which is believed to possess the Middle East’s only existing nuclear arsenal.

According to the congressional document reviewed by The Associated Press, the Trump administration aims to secure 20 nuclear business deals globally. The proposal argues that reaching an agreement with Saudi Arabia “will advance the national security interests of the United States, breaking with the failed policies of inaction and indecision that our competitors have capitalized on to disadvantage American industry and diminish the United States standing globally in this critical sector.”

The nuclear power plant technology market has become increasingly competitive, with China, France, Russia, and South Korea among the leading exporters. American officials see nuclear cooperation as both an economic opportunity and a way to maintain influence over nuclear development.

The draft agreement would include oversight of “proliferation-sensitive areas,” specifically listing enrichment, fuel fabrication, and reprocessing as potential areas of cooperation. This suggests that once bilateral safeguards are established, Saudi Arabia could acquire uranium enrichment technology or capabilities, possibly even from the United States.

This approach differs significantly from the United Arab Emirates, which signed a “123 agreement” with the U.S. to build its Barakah nuclear power plant with South Korean assistance. The UAE specifically agreed to forego enrichment capabilities, establishing what nonproliferation experts consider the “gold standard” for civilian nuclear power development.

The Saudi interest in potential nuclear weapons capability is directly tied to regional tensions with Iran. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has explicitly stated that if Iran obtains a nuclear bomb, “we will have to get one.”

Iran maintains that its nuclear program is peaceful, though Western nations and the IAEA have documented that Iran had an organized military nuclear program until 2003. Tehran has been enriching uranium up to 60% purity – a short technical step from weapons-grade levels of 90% – making it the only country to reach such levels without a declared weapons program.

While Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issued a religious edict against building atomic weapons, Iranian officials have increasingly hinted they might pursue nuclear weapons amid escalating tensions with the United States. The Trump administration has threatened military action if Iran doesn’t reach a new nuclear deal, following nationwide protests and government crackdowns that reportedly resulted in thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of detentions.

The prospect of Saudi Arabia gaining enrichment capabilities raises complex questions about nuclear proliferation in one of the world’s most volatile regions, potentially triggering a regional arms race with far-reaching consequences for global security.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

9 Comments

  1. The reported details of this proposed deal are quite alarming. Granting Saudi Arabia even limited enrichment capabilities could significantly undermine regional security and the global nonproliferation framework. Careful consideration and stringent controls are an absolute necessity.

    • I agree, the regional implications are deeply concerning. This is a high-stakes situation that requires meticulous negotiation and implementation to avoid disastrous consequences.

  2. This proposed deal seems risky and concerning. Allowing Saudi Arabia to gain even limited enrichment capability could open the door to a potential weapons program, which would be extremely destabilizing for the Middle East. Nonproliferation experts are right to sound the alarm.

    • Linda B. Martinez on

      You’re right, the stakes are very high here. The US will need to weigh the potential benefits against the serious proliferation risks before proceeding with any nuclear cooperation agreement.

  3. Robert V. Lopez on

    As an arms control expert, I have serious reservations about this potential deal. Allowing Saudi Arabia to develop any uranium enrichment capacity, even under IAEA safeguards, carries enormous proliferation risks that could destabilize the entire region. Caution is warranted.

  4. Interesting development. The potential for uranium enrichment capabilities in Saudi Arabia raises serious proliferation concerns, especially given the regional tensions. Careful oversight and strict safeguards would be crucial if any deal moves forward.

    • Agreed. The timing is delicate, and the details will be critical to ensure this doesn’t undermine regional stability and the global nonproliferation regime.

  5. Noah H. Hernandez on

    Uranium enrichment in Saudi Arabia is a worrying prospect. While nuclear power can have peaceful applications, the technology could also be misused for weapons development. Robust safeguards and transparency will be essential if this deal is to move forward.

  6. This news is quite troubling. Uranium enrichment in Saudi Arabia, even on a limited scale, could be a major setback for global nonproliferation efforts. The timing is particularly sensitive given the current tensions in the region. Safeguards will be absolutely crucial.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.