Listen to the article
A Minnesota jury delivered a substantial verdict against healthcare giant Johnson & Johnson on Friday, awarding $65.5 million to a mother of three who developed a rare and aggressive form of cancer after using the company’s talcum products.
Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a cancer affecting the lining of the lungs that is primarily associated with asbestos exposure. Carley’s legal team successfully argued that her lifelong use of Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder, beginning in childhood, exposed her to asbestos-contaminated talc that contributed to her illness.
The verdict follows a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, where Carley’s attorneys presented evidence suggesting Johnson & Johnson knowingly sold and marketed talc-based products despite being aware of potential asbestos contamination risks. They emphasized that Carley’s family was never warned about possible dangers associated with the product’s regular use.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability,” said Ben Braly, Carley’s attorney, following the decision.
Johnson & Johnson has vehemently disputed the claims and announced it will appeal the verdict. Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for the company, defended the safety of their product in a statement after the ruling.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said.
The Minnesota verdict represents another significant legal setback for Johnson & Johnson, which faces thousands of similar lawsuits nationwide. The company discontinued sales of its talc-based baby powder in the United States in 2020 amid mounting litigation, eventually ceasing global sales of talc-containing powder products in 2023.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $40 million to two women who claimed the company’s talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. In an even larger October verdict, a California jury awarded $966 million to the family of a woman who died from mesothelioma allegedly linked to contaminated baby powder.
These cases highlight growing concerns about talc safety that have plagued the consumer healthcare industry in recent years. Talc, a naturally occurring mineral often found near asbestos deposits in the earth, has been used in cosmetic and personal care products for decades due to its moisture-absorbing properties and ability to prevent friction and rashes.
The litigation against Johnson & Johnson has significantly impacted the company’s financial outlook and reputation. In 2021, the company attempted to resolve its talc liabilities by creating a subsidiary, LTL Management, which immediately filed for bankruptcy protection. However, courts have rejected this strategy, forcing Johnson & Johnson to face cases individually.
The financial and reputational costs have been substantial for Johnson & Johnson, once considered among America’s most trusted brands. Beyond direct litigation expenses, the company has experienced market capitalization losses and damage to consumer confidence in its broader product portfolio, which spans pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and consumer goods.
Public health advocates view these verdicts as validation of concerns they’ve raised for years about potential asbestos contamination in talc-based products. Meanwhile, the legal outcomes are closely watched by other manufacturers who have used talc in their products, as they could establish precedents for future liability claims.
Johnson & Johnson maintains that scientific evidence supports the safety of their talc products and that independent studies have failed to establish a causal link between cosmetic talc and cancer. However, juries in several jurisdictions have found the company’s internal documents and testing procedures sufficient to establish liability.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
It’s disturbing to think a company could knowingly sell contaminated products for years without proper warnings. This case highlights the need for stronger oversight and stricter penalties to deter such behavior.
This verdict underscores the importance of rigorous, independent testing of consumer products. Manufacturers should not be allowed to prioritize profits over public health and safety.
Tragic that someone developed such a serious illness from a common household product. This case highlights the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability in the personal care industry.
This verdict is a win for consumer rights, but the bigger question is whether it will prompt meaningful change in the way personal care products are regulated and monitored for potential health hazards.
While the monetary award is substantial, the real victory here is the public acknowledgment of J&J’s apparent misconduct. Hopefully this will lead to greater scrutiny of the talc industry and better protections for consumers.
While the monetary damages are substantial, the real victory here is the public accountability. Hopefully this will lead to more transparent safety practices in the personal care industry.
Tragic to see someone develop such a serious illness from using a common consumer product. The jury’s decision underscores the importance of transparency and accountability when it comes to public health and safety.
This is a significant ruling against J&J. Talcum powder cancer cases have been a major legal battle, with the company repeatedly denying any asbestos contamination. It will be interesting to see how this verdict affects future claims and settlements.