Listen to the article
French Tech Giant Capgemini Divests from ICE Amid Immigration Controversy
French multinational Capgemini announced Sunday it will sell its subsidiary that provides technology services to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), responding to mounting pressure over the agency’s controversial immigration enforcement tactics.
The decision comes amid heightened scrutiny of ICE operations, particularly in Minneapolis, where recent enforcement actions resulted in the fatal shootings of two American citizens by federal immigration officers. These incidents have sparked international concern, including from French government officials who urged Capgemini to reassess its relationship with the agency.
“The rules for working with U.S. federal government agencies did not allow the group to exercise appropriate control over certain aspects of the operations of this subsidiary to ensure alignment with the group’s objectives,” Capgemini stated in its announcement. The company noted that Capgemini Government Solutions represents only 0.4% of its projected 2025 revenue.
Capgemini CEO Aiman Ezzat revealed in a LinkedIn post that he had only recently become aware of the subsidiary’s contract with ICE. “The nature and scope of this work has raised questions compared to what we typically do as a business and technology firm,” Ezzat wrote, suggesting the activities fell outside the company’s standard business practices.
The divestment follows direct pressure from the French government. Finance Minister Roland Lescure had publicly called on the company to “shed light, in an extremely transparent manner, on its activities… and to question the nature of these activities” during a parliamentary session last week. Lescure’s office has not commented on Capgemini’s decision to sell the subsidiary.
According to reports from the NGO Multinationals Observatory, Capgemini Government Solutions had been providing ICE with technical tools used to locate targets during immigration enforcement operations. These tools allegedly supported the agency’s controversial crackdown under the Trump administration, which has implemented aggressive immigration policies that have drawn international criticism for their severity and methods.
The controversy highlights the growing ethical considerations facing technology companies that contract with immigration enforcement agencies. Similar concerns have emerged in recent years about tech firms providing facial recognition, data analytics, and surveillance tools that enable aggressive immigration enforcement actions.
Capgemini, a global leader in consulting and technology services with more than 340,000 employees across over 50 countries, has not provided detailed information about the specific nature of the technology services it provided to ICE or whether those tools were directly involved in controversial enforcement actions.
The company’s decision reflects a growing trend of European corporations distancing themselves from controversial U.S. immigration policies. It also demonstrates the increasing pressure that governments and civil society organizations can exert on multinational corporations regarding their government contracts, particularly those that may implicate human rights concerns.
Immigration policy experts note that this development comes at a time of heightened tension around immigration enforcement in the United States, with federal agencies facing accusations of overreach and excessive force. The fatal shootings in Minneapolis have become a flashpoint in this ongoing debate, drawing particular attention from European allies concerned about human rights implications.
As the divestment process begins, questions remain about who might acquire Capgemini Government Solutions and whether the technology services it provides to ICE will continue under new ownership. The company has indicated the sale will commence immediately, though no timeline for completion has been announced.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
Overall, Capgemini’s move seems to be a principled stance, even if it’s a small part of their business. It will be interesting to see if this sets a precedent for other tech companies to reconsider their relationships with government agencies embroiled in controversial policies.
While Capgemini’s subsidiary only represents a small portion of its overall revenue, the optics of this move are significant. It signals a willingness by the company to take a stance on a controversial political issue, which could influence other businesses.
I’m curious to see how this divestment will impact Capgemini’s relationship with the US government going forward. Will it limit their ability to secure future contracts, or will it enhance their reputation in certain markets?
That’s a good question. The company will likely have to navigate a delicate balance between its commercial interests and the political sensitivities around this issue.
The fatal shootings of American citizens by ICE officials that prompted this decision are deeply concerning. This incident highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in immigration enforcement practices.
The French government’s involvement in urging Capgemini to reconsider its relationship with ICE highlights the international scrutiny on this issue. It’s a complex situation given the political sensitivities around immigration and national security.
Absolutely. This decision by a major French tech company adds an interesting international dimension to the debate over ICE’s practices in the US.
This is an interesting development. Capgemini’s decision to divest from its ICE subsidiary reflects the growing concerns over the agency’s controversial practices. It will be important to see how this move impacts the ongoing debates around immigration enforcement in the US.
You raise a good point. This divestment could put more pressure on ICE and the US government to reevaluate their immigration policies and enforcement tactics.