Listen to the article
Stricter SNAP Work Requirements Now Affecting Older Adults and Parents Across U.S.
Millions of Americans who rely on food assistance could lose their benefits in the coming months as expanded work requirements for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) take effect nationwide.
The changes, stemming from legislation signed by former President Donald Trump, are now being implemented across states on varying timelines. The new rules extend work mandates to adults aged 55-64 and parents of teenagers, requiring them to work, volunteer, or participate in job training for at least 80 hours monthly to maintain eligibility.
For many recipients, the three-month countdown has already begun. In Texas, where implementation started in October, some beneficiaries may have already lost their benefits as of January 1. Alaska, Colorado, Georgia, and Hawaii began their implementation in November, putting recipients at risk of losing benefits imminently if they cannot document sufficient work hours.
Illinois and Ohio are implementing the requirements this week, meaning recipients in these states could face benefit losses by May. Ohio officials have indicated that work documentation requirements will begin in March.
The work requirements previously applied only to adults aged 18-54 without dependents under 18. Now, the expanded criteria will affect parents without children younger than 14 and older adults up to age 64. Additionally, the law eliminates previous exemptions for homeless individuals, veterans, and young adults aging out of foster care.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, these changes are expected to reduce SNAP enrollment by approximately 2.4 million people over the next decade.
Some states have secured temporary exemptions due to high unemployment rates. California has negotiated a waiver until January 2027, while New York will begin implementing the requirements in March for most of the state, though Saratoga County started in October.
SNAP currently serves about 42 million Americans—roughly one in eight people nationwide. The majority of recipients live in households with incomes below the federal poverty line, which stands at approximately $33,000 for a family of four. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning think tank, reports that about three in five SNAP beneficiaries are in families with children, and more than one in three are in households with seniors or people with disabilities.
Contrary to some perceptions, nearly 40% of SNAP recipients are already in working households. The average monthly benefit per person amounts to approximately $190—a crucial supplement for families struggling with rising food costs in today’s economy.
The changing work requirements arrive amid growing concerns about food insecurity in the United States. Food banks nationwide have reported increased demand over the past year as pandemic-era benefits expired and inflation pushed grocery prices higher. These new restrictions may further strain the social safety net at a time when many working families already face economic pressure.
The implementation of stricter work requirements isn’t the only change coming to the SNAP program. Starting in October, states will be required to shoulder a greater portion of administrative costs—75% compared to the current roughly 50-50 split with the federal government. Additionally, beginning in late 2027, states with higher error rates in payment distribution will be required to cover some of the actual benefit costs.
These fiscal changes could potentially impact how states administer the program, potentially leading to tighter eligibility verification or other administrative adjustments to control costs.
As these changes roll out across the country, advocacy groups are working to ensure eligible recipients understand the new requirements and how to document their compliance to maintain this vital food assistance.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
As a mining and commodities investor, I’m not directly affected by these SNAP changes. But I’m always interested in policies that could impact consumer spending and the broader economy. It will be worth watching how this affects food security and poverty levels in the affected regions.
Absolutely, the macroeconomic ripple effects are worth considering, especially in the current environment. Changes to social safety net programs can have far-reaching implications.
Interesting to see the expanded work requirements for SNAP. It will certainly put pressure on some recipients, though the intent is to encourage self-reliance. I wonder how states are handling the implementation and support services for affected individuals.
Yes, the details around implementation and support will be crucial. It’s a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides.
This is a controversial policy change that could have significant impacts on low-income families. While the goal of promoting self-sufficiency is understandable, the practical challenges of finding 80 hours of work per month may be daunting for many SNAP recipients.
Exactly, the logistics and potential unintended consequences will need close monitoring. Balancing assistance with work incentives is never easy.
I’m curious to see how this plays out, especially for recipients in states that have already begun implementation. The work requirements seem quite strict, and I wonder if there are enough support services in place to help people meet the new rules.
Good point. The availability and accessibility of job training, childcare, and other assistance programs will be key factors in determining the real-world impacts.
While the intent behind the work requirements may be to encourage self-sufficiency, I worry that the timing and implementation could be overly harsh, especially with the current economic conditions. Careful monitoring and adjustments will be crucial to avoid unintended hardship.