Listen to the article
Beverly Hills Issues Apology to Celtics Star Jaylen Brown Over Event Dispute
The City of Beverly Hills has apologized to Boston Celtics star Jaylen Brown following a dispute over an event he hosted during NBA All-Star weekend, acknowledging that its initial public statements contained inaccurate information.
In a statement posted to Instagram on Thursday, city officials retracted their earlier claim that Brown’s event had been shut down due to permit issues. “Upon further internal review, the City has determined that its prior public communication contained inaccurate information,” the statement read. “Specifically, no permit application was submitted nor denied for the event and the residence does not have any prior related violations on record.”
The controversy stems from an event Brown hosted at the home of Oakley founder Jim Jannard the night before the NBA All-Star Game. Brown, who has an endorsement deal with Oakley, was promoting his performance brand, 741, at the gathering.
The city’s reversal comes after it had previously told The Boston Globe on Sunday that “an event permit had been applied for and denied by the City due to previous violations associated with events at the address.” That initial statement claimed organizers had proceeded with the event despite knowing it wasn’t permitted, leading to police intervention.
Brown immediately disputed this characterization, telling ESPN, “That was not true. We didn’t need a permit because the owner of the house, that was his space. We were family friends. He opened up the festivities to us so we didn’t have to. We never applied for one.”
While Beverly Hills has now acknowledged the misinformation regarding the permit application and prior violations, tensions remain over the actual reason for shutting down the event. In the city’s updated statement, officials maintained that the event was closed due to a perceived code violation.
This explanation has not satisfied Brown or his representatives. In a statement posted to the X platform Thursday night, Jaylen Brown Enterprises expressed continued concerns about the city’s justification for intervention.
“No alleged proof of any violation was ever produced to the homeowner, our team or legal counsel,” the statement read. “Without observation, documentation, or confirmed violations, enforcement action based on belief alone raises serious due-process concerns.”
The situation highlights the sometimes complicated relationship between high-profile athletes, local regulations, and enforcement actions. As one of the NBA’s brightest young stars, Brown has established himself not only on the court but as an entrepreneur and brand ambassador off it. His performance brand, 741, represents part of his growing business portfolio that extends beyond basketball.
Brown, a key contributor to the Celtics’ success this season, has built a reputation for being outspoken on social issues and assertive about his rights and business interests. His quick and public response to the Beverly Hills situation reflects this approach.
Despite the ongoing disagreement about the circumstances surrounding the event’s closure, Jaylen Brown Enterprises indicated an openness to resolving the matter, stating it remains “open to a constructive resolution with the City of Beverly Hills.”
The dispute comes during what has otherwise been a standout season for Brown, who earned his third All-Star selection and continues to help lead the Celtics in their championship pursuit. The team currently sits atop the Eastern Conference standings.
Neither the City of Beverly Hills nor representatives from the Boston Celtics have provided additional comments beyond their official statements regarding the matter as of press time.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
This incident seems to be a case of miscommunication and overreaction by the city. I hope they take this as a learning experience and work to improve their event permitting process to be more fair and transparent in the future.
This situation highlights the challenges that athletes and entertainers can face when trying to host events, even in well-known cities like Beverly Hills. I’m curious to learn more about the city’s event permitting process and how it can be improved to be more fair and transparent.
Good point. The city’s initial claims seemed questionable, so I’m glad they took the time to review the details and issue a proper apology. Hopefully this leads to better communication and collaboration moving forward.
The city’s reversal on this issue is a positive step, but it raises questions about their event permitting practices. I hope they take this opportunity to review and refine their processes to be more equitable and supportive of community initiatives.
The NBA All-Star weekend is a major event that brings a lot of attention and economic activity to the host city. It’s understandable that Beverly Hills would want to carefully manage related events, but they should do so in a constructive way that supports the community.
It’s good to see the city correct the record and apologize for the initial inaccurate statements. This type of accountability helps build trust between the community and local government.
Absolutely. Admitting mistakes and correcting the record is the right thing to do, especially when it involves high-profile public figures like Jaylen Brown. It shows a willingness to be transparent and improve processes.
Jaylen Brown is an influential young athlete who is using his platform to promote his own brand and support the community. The city should work to accommodate these kinds of positive initiatives rather than create unnecessary roadblocks.
Agreed. It’s encouraging to see the city acknowledge their mistake and issue a thoughtful apology. Maintaining good relationships with high-profile figures can benefit everyone involved.
It’s good to see Beverly Hills taking responsibility and issuing an apology to Jaylen Brown. Transparency and accountability are important, especially for high-profile events and disputes involving public officials.
Absolutely. The city should have verified the facts before making public statements about the event’s permit status. This type of correction helps maintain trust between the community and local government.