Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

The current dispute between the United States and Europe over Greenland’s future marks just the latest chapter in a complex history of trans-Atlantic tensions. Despite being steadfast allies since World War II, the relationship between America and European nations has weathered several significant diplomatic crises that have tested the resilience of their partnership.

In 1956, the Suez Crisis emerged as one of the earliest major post-war rifts when France, the United Kingdom, and Israel invaded Egypt to overthrow President Gamal Abdel Nasser and regain control of the Suez Canal. The United States, concerned about Cold War implications, applied substantial diplomatic and economic pressure to halt the operation. This American intervention severely damaged relations with London and Paris and symbolized Europe’s declining global influence in the post-colonial era.

During the Vietnam War, most European nations offered diplomatic support to the United States but stopped short of committing troops, with France being a notable exception by withholding even diplomatic backing. The conflict sparked massive anti-war demonstrations across European cities, creating a political dilemma for governments caught between maintaining alliance solidarity and responding to growing public opposition. These tensions placed significant strain on trans-Atlantic cooperation throughout the conflict.

The early 1980s brought the Euromissile crisis, when the Soviet Union’s deployment of SS-20 missiles capable of rapidly striking Western European targets prompted NATO to counter with U.S. Pershing nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles and cruise missiles. This escalation triggered widespread fear of a new nuclear arms race, resulting in massive peace demonstrations across European capitals. Protesters frequently directed their anger at Washington, reflecting growing public anxiety about American military policy on European soil.

Perhaps the most pronounced modern rupture occurred in 2003 with the U.S. invasion of Iraq. When France and Germany refused to support President George W. Bush’s military action against Saddam Hussein’s regime, a serious diplomatic breach ensued. U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld dismissively labeled these nations as “Old Europe” while praising more supportive Eastern European countries as “New Europe,” creating lasting resentment among traditional allies.

America’s “war on terror” introduced additional friction through its controversial extraordinary rendition program, whereby terror suspects were captured—sometimes through what amounted to kidnapping—and transferred to locations where they could be interrogated and often tortured beyond the reach of U.S. law. Though some European governments initially cooperated with this program, mounting public outrage eventually forced leaders to publicly condemn these practices.

More recently, President Donald Trump’s return to the White House in January 2025 dramatically altered U.S. policy toward Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Trump’s warm rhetoric toward Russian President Vladimir Putin, coupled with a notable coolness toward Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and significant reductions in military aid to Kyiv, alarmed European leaders who view Ukraine’s sovereignty as essential to their own security interests.

The Trump administration further strained relations by releasing a national security strategy in December that characterized European allies as weak and unreliable. The document criticized their migration and free speech policies and even suggested they face “the prospect of civilizational erasure”—language that deeply concerned European capitals.

Trade tensions escalated in July when Trump threatened Europe with punitive tariffs, initially announcing a 30% tariff on goods from the 27-nation European Union—America’s largest trading partner. After negotiations, both sides agreed to a trade framework establishing a more moderate 15% tariff on most goods, though the episode further damaged the economic relationship.

As the current dispute over Greenland unfolds, it does so against this backdrop of periodic but significant disagreements that have defined the sometimes turbulent alliance between the United States and Europe. Despite these challenges, the trans-Atlantic partnership has demonstrated remarkable durability, continually finding ways to manage differences while maintaining cooperation on critical shared interests.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

12 Comments

  1. This timeline underscores how the transatlantic relationship has evolved over the decades, with periods of cooperation as well as conflict. It will be interesting to see how the Greenland issue unfolds and what that might reveal about the current state of US-Europe relations.

    • You make a good point. The Greenland situation could be a telling test case, highlighting the areas where US and European interests still align as well as where they diverge. Managing those differences constructively will be crucial going forward.

  2. The article paints a nuanced picture of the US-Europe dynamic, which has clearly had its ups and downs over the years. It’s a complex geopolitical relationship that has been shaped by a variety of historical events and shifting national priorities. Curious to see how it continues to evolve.

    • Agreed. The US-Europe alliance has proven resilient, but it’s also been tested by significant challenges. Navigating those tensions while maintaining a united front on key issues will be an ongoing balancing act for both sides.

  3. Jennifer Z. Thompson on

    The Suez Crisis in 1956 seems like a key turning point, where the US flexed its diplomatic muscle and constrained European powers. That must have stung for the UK and France at the time. Curious to see how the Greenland issue plays out in the current context.

    • The Suez Crisis was certainly a major blow to European influence. The US was increasingly asserting itself as the dominant global power, which created frictions with its traditional allies. Greenland is an interesting case study in the modern dynamic.

  4. The article highlights how the US-Europe relationship has been tested by significant events like the Vietnam War. It’s a reminder that even close allies can have divergent interests and priorities on the global stage. Maintaining unity amid such differences is an ongoing challenge.

    • Isabella Garcia on

      Absolutely. The Vietnam War in particular seemed to drive a wedge between the US and many European nations, despite their broader alliance. Managing those tensions while preserving the overall partnership must have required a lot of diplomatic finesse.

  5. William Thompson on

    Interesting history of US-Europe tensions. It’s a complex relationship that has weathered many crises over the decades. I wonder what the underlying drivers are – geopolitics, economics, ideology? Curious to hear other perspectives on this.

    • You’re right, it’s a multilayered dynamic that has evolved over time. Balancing national interests, alliances, and global influence is an ongoing challenge for both sides.

  6. This is a helpful overview of the longstanding tensions between the US and Europe. It’s a relationship that has weathered many storms, from the Suez Crisis to the Vietnam War. The Greenland dispute seems like the latest chapter in this complex geopolitical dynamic.

    • Amelia E. Martinez on

      You’re right, the Greenland issue is the latest flashpoint in this evolving relationship. It will be interesting to see how the US and Europe manage this particular dispute and what it might reveal about the current state of their alliance.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.